Interpretation in wildlife tourism: Assessing the effectiveness of signage on visitor behaviour at a seal watching site in Iceland
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies have shown signs that have clear instructions that target a specific behaviour, justification and appeal to visitors' emotions, are more effective in moderating visitor behaviour.
“Several studies have shown signs that have clear instructions that target a specific behaviour [60], justification [61] and appeal to visitors’ emotions [34], are more effective in moderating visitor behaviour.”
From Effects of Regulating Visitor Viewing Proximity and the Intensity of Visitor Behaviour on Little Penguin (Eudyptula minor) Behaviour and Welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [61]
Cites
A review of human disturbance effects on nesting colonial waterbirds
Carney, K. M., & Sydeman, W. J. (1999) · Waterbirds: The International Journal of Waterbird Biology · doi:10.2307/1521995 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chiew, S. J., Butler, K. L., Sherwen, S. L., Coleman, G. J., Fanson, K. V., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060285 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
- Authors
- Marschall, S., Granquist, S. M., & Burns, G. L.
- Affiliations
- University Centre of the Westfjords (IS)
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Griffith University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Granquist, Sandra Magdalena
- Venue
- Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 17
- Pages
- 11-19
- ISSN
- 2213-0780 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2561265045
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 8.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ferðamálastofa
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Community-based Tourism Development and Sustainability
- Keywords
- interpretive signage, wildlife tourism, visitor behavior, wildlife disturbance, sustainable tourism management, family visitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
