Cited by 25Reproductive tract infections researchAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthCervical Cancer and HPV Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis in female children and adolescents evaluated for possible sexual abuse: a comparison of the InPouch TV culture method and wet mount microscopy.

Gallion, Hollye R., Dupree, Lisa J., Scott, Theresa A., Arnold, Donald H.·2009·Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology

Abstract

Study objective To compare the performance of wet mount microscopy and the InPouch TV culture method in diagnosing Trichomonas vaginalis in a cohort of female children and adolescents evaluated for possible sexual abuse.Design A prospective study in which samples for both wet mount and InPouch TV were collected from the vaginal vault of each participant. The wet mount was examined microscopically for the presence of motile trichomonads, and the InPouch TV was analyzed in accordance with manufacturer specifications.Setting A regional, university-affiliated sexual abuse center in Nashville, TN.Participants Females (N = 271) aged 10 to 17 years (inclusive) who met screening criteria for sexually transmitted infection testing in accordance with Centers for Disease Control recommendations, and who exhibited evidence of at least partial hymenal estrogenization.Main outcome measures A Trichomonas vaginalis diagnosis either via detection of motile trichomonads on wet mount or a positive InPouch TV.Results The median age of the 271 participants was 13.6 years, 88% (235/268) were genital Tanner stage 4 or 5, and 66% (173/263) were Caucasian. Trichomonas vaginalis was diagnosed by either wet mount or InPouch TV in 4% (12/274) of the possible sexually transmitted infection exposures. The sensitivity of wet mount was 8/12 = 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39, 0.86) and specificity was 262/262 = 1.00 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.00). The false negative rate of wet mount was 4/12 = 0.33 (95% CI: 0.14, 0.61).Conclusions A culture-based method such as InPouch TV should be considered for Trichomonas vaginalis diagnosis when evaluating children and adolescents in whom sexual abuse is a concern.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpag.2008.12.006

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 25

Metadata

Authors
Gallion, H. R., Dupree, L. J., Scott, T. A., & Arnold, D. H.
Affiliations
  • Meharry Medical College (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Gallion, Hollye R.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
300-305
ISSN
  • 0932-8610 (ISSN-L)
  • 1083-3188
OpenAlex
W2093686297
Cited by
25
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Keywords
Trichomonas vaginalis, trichomoniasis diagnosis, wet mount microscopy, sexually transmitted infections, child sexual abuse, adolescent girls, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Bacteriological Techniques, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Humans, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Trichomonas Vaginitis, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review