Cited by 42Endometriosis Research and TreatmentMenstrual Health and DisordersEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Use of Norethindrone Acetate Alone for Postoperative Suppression of Endometriosis Symptoms

Kaser, D.J., Missmer, S.A., Berry, K.F., Laufer, M.R.·2012·Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology

Abstract

Study objective To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of norethindrone acetate (NA) as single-agent hormonal therapy for suppression of endometriosis symptoms in adolescents and young adults.Design Retrospective study.Setting Two academic medical centers.Participants A keyword search using the query 'NA' was applied to the electronic medical records of all women treated by one gynecologist (M.R.L.) from 1992 to 2010. IRB-approved chart review was then conducted on the index records.Interventions Continuous treatment with NA (5-15 mg daily).Main outcome measures Postoperative bleeding and pain scores; adverse effects.Results One hundred and ninety-four patients with surgically diagnosed endometriosis initiated NA postoperatively during the study period. Median patient age was 18.9 years. 92.2% of patients had stage 1 or 2 disease, and distribution was similar among those excluded. Median pain scores decreased from 5 at NA initiation to 0 at follow-up (P = .0001) and bleeding scores from 2 to 0, respectively (P = .001) for all stages of endometriosis. Post-NA bleeding scores were improved regardless of prior hormonal regimen, and post-NA pain scores improved in all patients except for those previously prescribed GnRH-agonist plus add-back. Most patients (55.2%) did not report any side effects. The most common adverse effect was weight gain (16.1%), with a mean increase in BMI of 1.2 ± 1.6 kg/m(2) at 12 months.Conclusion NA alone is a well-tolerated, effective option to manage pain and bleeding for all stages of endometriosis. Among those on prior hormonal therapy, symptoms improved after NA initiation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpag.2011.09.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 42

Authors
Kaser, D. J., Missmer, S. A., Berry, K. F., & Laufer, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Laufer, M.R.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
105-108
ISSN
  • 0932-8610 (ISSN-L)
  • 1083-3188
OpenAlex
W2104287149
Cited by
42
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
norethindrone acetate, endometriosis, postoperative hormonal therapy, symptom suppression, dysmenorrhea, adolescents, young women, weight gain, tolerability
MeSH terms
Norethindrone Acetate, Adolescent, Adult, Contraceptives, Oral, Synthetic, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Metrorrhagia, Norethindrone, Retrospective Studies, Weight Gain, Pelvic Pain, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review