The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oocyte Cryopreservation for Fertility Preservation in Postpubertal Female Children at Risk for Premature Ovarian Failure Due to Accelerated Follicle Loss in Turner Syndrome or Cancer Treatments
Open accessAbstract
Objective To preliminarily study the feasibility of oocyte cryopreservation in postpubertal girls aged between 13 and 15 years who were at risk for premature ovarian failure due to the accelerated follicle loss associated with Turner syndrome or cancer treatments.Design Retrospective cohort and review of literature.Setting Academic fertility preservation unit.Participants Three girls diagnosed with Turner syndrome, 1 girl diagnosed with germ-cell tumor. and 1 girl diagnosed with lymphoblastic leukemia.Interventions Assessment of ovarian reserve, ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval, in vitro maturation, and mature oocyte cryopreservation.Main outcome measure Response to ovarian stimulation, number of mature oocytes cryopreserved and complications, if any.Results Mean anti-müllerian hormone, baseline follical stimulating hormone, estradiol, and antral follicle counts were 1.30 ± 0.39, 6.08 ± 2.63, 41.39 ± 24.68, 8.0 ± 3.2; respectively. In Turner girls the ovarian reserve assessment indicated already diminished ovarian reserve. Ovarian stimulation and oocyte cryopreservation was successfully performed in all female children referred for fertility preservation. A range of 4-11 mature oocytes (mean 8.1 ± 3.4) was cryopreserved without any complications. All girls tolerated the procedure well.Conclusions Oocyte cryopreservation is a feasible technique in selected female children at risk for premature ovarian failure. Further studies would be beneficial to test the success of oocyte cryopreservation in young girls.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To date, published data regarding oocyte cryopreservation in individuals with TS entails six retrospective studies and eight case reports comprising a total of 80 individuals ranging in age from 7 to 30 years.578,591,596-607”
From Clinical practice guidelines for the care of girls and women with Turner syndrome. (2024) · cites this paper as [596]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Loren, A. W., Mangu, P. B., Beck, L. N., Brennan, L. V., Magdalinski, A. J., Partridge, A. H., Quinn, G. P., Wallace, W. H., & Oktay, K. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.49.2678 · Cited by 1,615
Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline
(2013) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.028 · Cited by 928
Ovary and ovulation: Low temperature storage and grafting of human ovarian tissue
Newton, H. L., Aubard, Y., Rutherford, A., Sharma, V., & Gosden, R. G. (1996) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019423 · Cited by 540
Fertility preservation in female patients
Sönmezer, M. (2004) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmh021 · Cited by 495
Children born after cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes: a systematic review of outcome data
Wennerholm, U., Söderström‐Anttila, V., Bergh, C., Aittomäki, K., Hazekamp, J., Nygren, K. G., Selbing, A., & Loft, A. (2009) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dep125 · Cited by 295
Öktem, Ö., & Oktay, K. (2007) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.23071 · Cited by 292
Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone Levels in Healthy Females: A Nomogram Ranging from Infancy to Adulthood
Fong, S. L., Visser, J. A., Welt, C. K., de Rijke, Y. B., Eijkemans, M. J. C., Broekmans, F. J., Roes, E. M., Peters, W. H. M., Hokken‐Koelega, A. C. S., Fauser, B. C. J. M., et al. (2012) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2012-1440 · Cited by 260
Birgit, B., Julius, H., Carsten, R., Maryam, S., Gabriel, F., Victoria, K., Margareta, F., & Outi, H. (2009) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2008-0708 · Cited by 254
Cryopreservation of immature human oocytes and ovarian tissue: An emerging technology?
Oktay, K., Newton, H., Aubard, Y., Salha, O., & Gosden, R. G. (1998) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00207-0 · Cited by 239
Öktem, Ö., & Oktay, K. (2007) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-2042 · Cited by 212
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–107 of 107
Gynecologic and Obstetric Care in Patients With Turner Syndrome
Kashani, B. N., Perlman, B. E., & McGovern, P. G. (2018) · Topics in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.pgo.0000527925.47317.0a
Oocyte cryopreservation in mosaic Turner syndrome with polycystic ovaries
Sienko, A., Prakash, A., & MacDougall, J. (2023) · F&S Reports · doi:10.1016/j.xfre.2023.10.001
Dowlut‐McElroy, T., Hyunh, V. O., Roth, L. W., Ross, M. E., Priebe, A., Maher, J. Y., & Gomez‐Lobo, V. (2025) · Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2025.09.002
Brun, T., Sineux, M., Lavoué, V., Dion, L., Lévêque, J., & Duros, S. (2025) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.114886
An updated systematic review of fertility preservation options in individuals with Turner syndrome
Dennis, A., Barishansky, S. J., & Goldman, K. N. (2026) · F&S Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.xfnr.2026.100100
Kolesińska, Z., Obara-Moszyńska, M., Niedziela, M., & Kapczuk, K. (2026) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2026.1918808
Nawroth, F., & von Wolff, M. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-28679-6_23
Metadata
- Authors
- Oktay, K., & Bedoschi, G.
- Affiliations
- New York Medical College (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 342-346
- ISSN
- 0932-8610 (ISSN-L)
- 1083-3188
- PMC
- PMC4252563
- OpenAlex
- W2097776522
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 11.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Touro Scholar (Touro College) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21HD061259, R01HD053112)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Keywords
- oocyte cryopreservation, fertility preservation, premature ovarian failure, Turner syndrome, ovarian reserve, ovulation induction, in vitro maturation, germ cell tumors, lymphoblastic leukemia, chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage, anti-Müllerian hormone
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Estradiol, Female, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Ovarian Follicle, Humans, Neoplasms, Oocytes, Ovulation Induction, Retrospective Studies, Turner Syndrome, Cryopreservation, Primary Ovarian Insufficiency, Anti-Mullerian Hormone, Fertility Preservation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review