Cited by 523Pain Management and Opioid UseAnesthesia and Pain ManagementCancer survivorship and care

Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: a critical review of risk factors and strategies for prevention

Open access
Andersen, Kenneth Geving, Kehlet, Henrik·2011·The Journal of Pain

Abstract

Unlabelled Chronic pain after breast cancer treatment is a major clinical problem, affecting 25 to 60% of patients. Development of chronic pain after breast cancer treatment, as well as other surgical procedures, involves a complex pathophysiology that involves pre-, intra- and post-operative factors. This review is a systematic analysis on methodology and evidence in research into persistent pain after breast cancer treatment during the period 1995 to 2010, in order to clarify the significance and relative role of potential risk factors. Literature was identified by a search in PubMed and OVID, as well as by obtaining relevant studies from a systematic review of reference lists. Sixty papers were identified, most of these being retrospective or questionnaires. Only 2 studies included quantitative sensory testing and only 26 studies were prospective. Furthermore, about a third of the studies did not apply modern principles of surgical and adjuvant therapy. In summary, the data show inconsistencies in definition of chronic pain and treatment groups, as well as in the collection of pre- intra- and post-operative data, precluding conclusions with regard to pathophysiologic mechanisms as well as rational strategies for prevention and treatment. However, nerve damage and radiotherapy appear to be significant risk factors for chronic pain. A proposal for the design of future prospective studies is presented.Perspective A comprehensive and systematic approach to research in chronic pain after breast cancer treatment is necessary in order to understand the pathophysiology and thus develop strategies for prevention and treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.12.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 107 · Cited by 523

Authors
Andersen, K. G., & Kehlet, H.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
The Journal of Pain
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
725-746
ISSN
1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075091924
Cited by
523
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 21
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
chronic pain, breast cancer, postoperative pain, risk factors, nerve injury, radiotherapy, pain prevention, pathophysiology, surgical complications, adjuvant therapy
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Pain, Postoperative Complications, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Databases, Factual, Radiosurgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review