Cited by 72Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatmentMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Unravelling Fibromyalgia—Steps toward Individualized Management

Open access
Häuser, Winfried, Perrot, Serge, Clauw, Daniel J., Fitzcharles, Mary-Ann·2018·The Journal of Pain

Abstract

The heterogeneity of the clinical presentation and the pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with fibromyalgia (FM), and the modest results on average for any therapy, call for a more individualized management strategy. Individualized treatment can be on the basis of subgrouping of patients according to associated conditions (mental health problems, chronic overlapping pain conditions, other somatic diseases) or on disease severity. Categorizing FM as mild, moderate, or severe can be on the basis of clinical assessment (eg, degree of daily functioning) or on questionnaires. Shared decision-making regarding treatment options can be directed according to patient preferences, comorbidities, and availability in various health care settings. The European League Against Rheumatism guidelines recommend a tailored approach directed by FM key symptoms (pain, sleep disorders, fatigue, depression, disability), whereas the German guidelines recommend management tailored to disease severity, with mild disease not requiring any specific treatment, and more severe disease requiring multicomponent therapy (combination of drug treatment with aerobic exercise and psychological treatments). When indicated, treatments should follow a stepwise approach beginning with easily available therapies such as aerobic exercise and amitriptyline. Successful application of a tailored treatment approach that is informed by individual patient characteristics should improve outcome of FM.Perspective This article presents suggestions for an individualized treatment strategy for FM patients on the basis of subgroups and disease severity. Categorizing FM as mild, moderate, or severe can be on the basis of clinical assessment (eg, degree of daily functioning) or questionnaires. Subgroups can be defined according to mental health and somatic comorbidities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.08.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 72

Authors
Häuser, W., Perrot, S., Clauw, D. J., & Fitzcharles, M.-A.
Affiliations
  • Klinikum Saarbrücken (DE)
  • Hôpital Cochin (FR)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Häuser, Winfried
Venue
The Journal of Pain
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
125-134
ISSN
1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2758045910
Cited by
72
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
fibromyalgia, personalized treatment, disease severity, patient subgroups, shared decision-making, aerobic exercise, amitriptyline, depression, sleep disorders, fatigue, chronic pain comorbidity, disease severity classification, treatment guidelines
MeSH terms
Fibromyalgia, Humans, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review