Cited by 69Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Process and outcomes of euthanasia requests under the Belgian Act on Euthanasia: A nationwide survey

Open access
Van Wesemael, Yanna, Cohen, Joachim, Bilsen, Johan, Smets, Tinne, Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje, Deliens, Luc·2011·Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Abstract

Context Since 2002, the administration of a lethal drug by a physician at the explicit request of the patient has been legal in Belgium. The incidence of euthanasia in Belgium has been studied, but the process and outcomes of euthanasia requests have not been investigated.Objectives To describe which euthanasia requests were granted, withdrawn, and rejected since the enactment of the euthanasia law in terms of the characteristics of the patient, treating physician, and aspects of the consultation with a second physician.Methods A representative sample of 3006 Belgian physicians received a questionnaire investigating their most recent euthanasia request.Results The response rate was 34%. Since 2002, 39% of respondents had received a euthanasia request. Forty-eight percent of requests had been carried out, 5% had been refused, 10% had been withdrawn, and in 23%, the patient had died before euthanasia could be performed. Physicians' characteristics associated with receiving a request were not being religious, caring for a high number of terminally ill patients, and having experience in palliative care. Patient characteristics associated with granting a request were age, having cancer, loss of dignity, having no depression, and suffering without prospect of improvement as a reason for requesting euthanasia. A positive initial position toward the request from the attending physician and positive advice from the second physician also contributed to having a request granted.Conclusion Under the Belgian Act on Euthanasia, about half of the requests are granted. Factors related to the reason for the request, position of the attending physician toward the request, and advice from the second physician influence whether a request is granted or not.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.02.011

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This recommendation was prompted by evidence that in Belgium euthanasia cases are sometimes performed in complete disregard of two negative advices of the consulted physicians or in the absence of sufficient advices.

    “This recommendation was prompted by evidence that in Belgium euthanasia cases are sometimes performed in complete disregard of two negative advices of the consulted physicians or in the absence of sufficient advices (Chambaere, Vander Stichele, Mortier, Cohen, & Deliens, 2019;Van Wesemael et al., 2011).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 69

Authors
Van Wesemael, Y., Cohen, J., Bilsen, J., Smets, T., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B., & Deliens, L.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
Venue
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
721-733
ISSN
0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166617507
Cited by
69
References
35
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology (050158)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
euthanasia, euthanasia requests, Belgian euthanasia law, physician attitudes, palliative care, terminal illness, cancer, loss of dignity, physician-patient relationship
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Belgium, Euthanasia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patients, Physicians, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Selection Bias, Logistic Models, Health Care Surveys, Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review