Process and outcomes of euthanasia requests under the Belgian Act on Euthanasia: A nationwide survey
Open accessAbstract
Context Since 2002, the administration of a lethal drug by a physician at the explicit request of the patient has been legal in Belgium. The incidence of euthanasia in Belgium has been studied, but the process and outcomes of euthanasia requests have not been investigated.Objectives To describe which euthanasia requests were granted, withdrawn, and rejected since the enactment of the euthanasia law in terms of the characteristics of the patient, treating physician, and aspects of the consultation with a second physician.Methods A representative sample of 3006 Belgian physicians received a questionnaire investigating their most recent euthanasia request.Results The response rate was 34%. Since 2002, 39% of respondents had received a euthanasia request. Forty-eight percent of requests had been carried out, 5% had been refused, 10% had been withdrawn, and in 23%, the patient had died before euthanasia could be performed. Physicians' characteristics associated with receiving a request were not being religious, caring for a high number of terminally ill patients, and having experience in palliative care. Patient characteristics associated with granting a request were age, having cancer, loss of dignity, having no depression, and suffering without prospect of improvement as a reason for requesting euthanasia. A positive initial position toward the request from the attending physician and positive advice from the second physician also contributed to having a request granted.Conclusion Under the Belgian Act on Euthanasia, about half of the requests are granted. Factors related to the reason for the request, position of the attending physician toward the request, and advice from the second physician influence whether a request is granted or not.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This recommendation was prompted by evidence that in Belgium euthanasia cases are sometimes performed in complete disregard of two negative advices of the consulted physicians or in the absence of sufficient advices.
“This recommendation was prompted by evidence that in Belgium euthanasia cases are sometimes performed in complete disregard of two negative advices of the consulted physicians or in the absence of sufficient advices (Chambaere, Vander Stichele, Mortier, Cohen, & Deliens, 2019;Van Wesemael et al., 2011).”
From Psychiatric patients requesting euthanasia: Guidelines for sound clinical and ethical decision making (2019) · cites this paper as Van Wesemael et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- Van Wesemael, Y., Cohen, J., Bilsen, J., Smets, T., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B., & Deliens, L.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
- Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
- Venue
- Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 721-733
- ISSN
- 0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2166617507
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology (050158)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Keywords
- euthanasia, euthanasia requests, Belgian euthanasia law, physician attitudes, palliative care, terminal illness, cancer, loss of dignity, physician-patient relationship
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Belgium, Euthanasia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patients, Physicians, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Selection Bias, Logistic Models, Health Care Surveys, Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review