The Nature and Timing of Family-Provider Communication in Late-Stage Cancer: A Qualitative Study of Caregivers’ Experiences
Open accessAbstract
Context Family members of people with advanced cancer can experience intensified distress and uncertainty during the final stages of their loved one's illness. Enhanced comprehension about disease progression, symptom management, and options for care can help families adapt, cope, and plan for the future. Objectives Guided by concepts from the Sense of Coherence Theory, which illuminates factors that contribute to adaptation in stressful situations, the objective of this study was to explore and describe family caregivers' accounts of the nature and timing of communication they had with a loved one's health care provider(s) during the advanced stages of cancer and before hospice enrollment. Methods Retrospective in-depth interviews were conducted with caregivers of 46 people who died of cancer. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and submitted to an iterative process of qualitative data analysis that included 1) systematic coding, 2) the use of data matrices to display summarized results and collapse the codes into themes, 3) and axial coding to characterize the nature of the themes. Results Overall, communication with providers was found to be either 1) satisfactory or 2) unsatisfactory. Satisfactory communication was 1) compassionate, 2) responsive, and/or 3) dedicated. Unsatisfactory communication was described as 1) sparse, 2) conflicted, 3) contradictory, and/or 4) brink of death. Conclusion Communication with health care providers is critical for helping family car…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This neglect has been studied by many researchers.
“This neglect has been studied by many researchers [42–44].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [43]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lund, L., Ross, L., Petersen, M. A., & Groenvold, M. (2015) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2529-0 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Chong, E., Crowe, L., Mentor, K., Pandanaboyana, S., & Sharp, L. (2023) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-022-07468-7 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
- Authors
- Waldrop, D. P., Meeker, M. A., Kerr, C., Skretny, J., Tangeman, J., & Milch, R.
- Affiliations
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Waldrop, Deborah P.
- Venue
- Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 182-194
- ISSN
- 0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965138401
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- John A. Hartford Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
- Keywords
- family caregivers, family-provider communication, advanced cancer, late-stage cancer, hospice care, sense of coherence, caregiver distress, symptom management, end-of-life care, caregiver experiences
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, New York, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers, Terminally Ill, Health Communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review