An intervention to enhance goals-of-care communication between heart failure patients and heart failure providers
Open accessAbstract
Context Heart failure patients contend with a markedly impaired quality of life, experiencing emotional distress and severe physical discomfort that increases in frequency in the last months of life. Improving communication between patients and providers about goals of care has the potential to improve patient-provider communication and patient outcomes.Objectives To determine the effects of a goals-of-care (GoC) intervention compared to usual care on the number of GoC conversations, quality of communication between patients and providers, referrals to palliative care services and completion of advance care directives.Methods A two-group randomized study (n = 40/group) compared a GoC intervention to usual care, conducted in an academic heart failure (HF) clinic. The GoC intervention was a previsit patient activation-education, telephone-based intervention delivered by a nurse. The primary outcome of the study was number of GoC conversations between HF patients and HF providers. Secondary outcomes were quality of communication, number of referrals to palliative care, and completion of advance directives.Results Patients averaged 58.15 ± 11.26 years of age, with mean left ventricular ejection fraction = 30.31 ± 9.72% and Seattle Heart Failure Model scores = 95.1 ± 1.60. There was a significant increase in goals-of-care conversations (58% vs. 2.6%, P < 0.001) and quality of end-of-life communication (P = 0.03) in the GoC group compared to usual care after the intervention. There were no differences between groups on the other outcomes.Conclusion The GoC intervention resulted in more GoC conversations and higher quality communication between HF patients and providers without increased anxiety or depression. Further studies are needed to assess impact on longer term quality of care and patient outcomes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patient-centred somatic symptom interventions to improve end-of-life quality often have a limited impact.
“However, patient-centred somatic symptom interventions to improve end-of-life quality often have a limited impact.24”
From Psychological adjustment to death anxiety: a qualitative study of Chinese patients with advanced cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [24]
The Introduction and Discussion describe a goals-of-care communication intervention for heart failure patients, not a somatic symptom intervention. The Results report improved end-of-life communication but do not assess end-of-life quality of life or establish that patient-centred somatic symptom interventions often have limited impact. Searches for limited impact, somatic symptoms, and quality-of-life intervention outcomes found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 66
- Authors
- Doorenbos, A. Z., Levy, W. C., Curtis, J. R., & Dougherty, C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Doorenbos, Ardith Z.
- Venue
- Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 353-360
- ISSN
- 0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5545129
- OpenAlex
- W2464403383
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 4.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Palliative Care Research Center (NCT02466100)
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Keywords
- goals of care, heart failure, patient-provider communication, end-of-life communication, palliative care referral, advance directives, patient activation, telephone-delivered intervention, nurse-led intervention, quality of life, emotional distress
- MeSH terms
- Communication, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nurses, Palliative Care, Patient Care Planning, Patient Education as Topic, Professional-Patient Relations, Quality of Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Terminal Care, Advance Directives, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review