The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defining Advance Care Planning for Adults: A Consensus Definition From a Multidisciplinary Delphi Panel
Open accessAbstract
Context Despite increasing interest in advance care planning (ACP) and previous ACP descriptions, a consensus definition does not yet exist to guide clinical, research, and policy initiatives.Objective The aim of this study was to develop a consensus definition of ACP for adults.Methods We convened a Delphi panel of multidisciplinary, international ACP experts consisting of 52 clinicians, researchers, and policy leaders from four countries and a patient/surrogate advisory committee. We conducted 10 rounds using a modified Delphi method and qualitatively analyzed panelists' input. Panelists identified several themes lacking consensus and iteratively discussed and developed a final consensus definition.Results Panelists identified several tensions concerning ACP concepts such as whether the definition should focus on conversations vs. written advance directives; patients' values vs. treatment preferences; current shared decision making vs. future medical decisions; and who should be included in the process. The panel achieved a final consensus one-sentence definition and accompanying goals statement: "Advance care planning is a process that supports adults at any age or stage of health in understanding and sharing their personal values, life goals, and preferences regarding future medical care. The goal of advance care planning is to help ensure that people receive medical care that is consistent with their values, goals and preferences during serious and chronic illness." The panel also described strategies to best support adults in ACP.Conclusions A multidisciplinary Delphi panel developed a consensus definition for ACP for adults that can be used to inform implementation and measurement of ACP clinical, research, and policy initiatives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The instructions acknowledge that ACP is a process [12], preferences often evolve over time in the context of life-limiting disease, and the main goal of the study is to engage participants in the process of considering their values and goals for end of life care, discussing them with key others, and appointing and communicating with a health care decision maker.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique
Hasson, F. (2000) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01567.x · Cited by 5,951
Diamond, I. R., Grant, R. C., Feldman, B. M., Pencharz, P. B., Ling, S. C., Moore, A. M., & Wales, P. W. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002 · Cited by 3,740
The Delphi technique: myths and realities
Powell, C. (2003) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x · Cited by 2,611
The National Committee for Quality Assurance
Iglehart, J. K. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199609263351322 · Cited by 1,826
Communication About Serious Illness Care Goals: A Review and Synthesis of Best Practices
Bernacki, R. E., & Block, S. D. (2014) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271 · Cited by 1,422
Advance Directives and Outcomes of Surrogate Decision Making before Death
Silveira, M. J., Kim, S. Y. H., & Langa, K. M. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa0907901 · Cited by 1,298
van der Steen, J. T., Radbruch, L., Hertogh, C. M., de Boer, M. E., Hughes, J. C., Larkin, P., Francke, A. L., Jünger, S., Gove, D., Firth, P., et al. (2014) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216313493685 · Cited by 997
Redefining the “Planning” in Advance Care Planning: Preparing for End-of-Life Decision Making
Sudore, R. L., & Fried, T. R. (2010) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-153-4-201008170-00008 · Cited by 854
Self-citationDelphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision‐making tasks in education
Clayton, M. J. (1997) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/0144341970170401 · Cited by 850
National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care
Dahlin, C. M. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780190223755.003.0001 · Cited by 511
Cited by
Sorted by citations
2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure
Heidenreich, P. A., Bozkurt, B., Aguilar, D., Allen, L. A., Byun, J. J., Colvin, M. M., Deswal, A., Drazner, M. H., Dunlay, S. M., Evers, L. R., et al. (2022) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012 · Cited by 2,862
Heidenreich, P. A., Bozkurt, B., Aguilar, D., Allen, L. A., Byun, J. J., Colvin, M. M., Deswal, A., Drazner, M. H., Dunlay, S. M., Evers, L. R., et al. (2022) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001063 · Cited by 4,922
Rietjens, J. A. C., Sudore, R. L., Connolly, M., van Delden, J. J., Drickamer, M. A., Droger, M., van der Heide, A., Heyland, D. K., Houttekier, D., Janssen, D. J. A., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30582-x · Cited by 1,371
Self-citationIntegration of oncology and palliative care: a Lancet Oncology Commission
Kaasa, S., Loge, J. H., Aapro, M., Albreht, T., Anderson, R., Bruera, E. D., Brunelli, C., Caraceni, A. T., Cervantes, A. M. R., Currow, D. C., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30415-7 · Cited by 879
Approximately One In Three US Adults Completes Any Type Of Advance Directive For End-Of-Life Care
Yadav, K. N., Gabler, N. B., Cooney, E. L., Kent, S. A., Kim, J., Herbst, N. P., Mante, A., Halpern, S. D., & Courtright, K. R. (2017) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0175 · Cited by 654
Metadata
- Authors
- Sudore, R. L., Lum, H. D., You, J. J., Hanson, L. C., Meier, D. E., Pantilat, S. Z., Matlock, D. D., Rietjens, J. A. C., Korfage, I. J., Ritchie, C. S., Kutner, J. S., Teno, J. M., Thomas, J., McMahan, R. D., & Heyland, D. K.
- Affiliations
- San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
- VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System (US)
- McMaster University (CA)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Coalition for Compassionate Care of California (US)
- Queen's University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Sudore, Rebecca L.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 821-832.e1
- ISSN
- 0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5728651
- OpenAlex
- W2571458453
- Cited by
- 1,726
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 204 · 2025: 214 · 2024: 239 · 2023: 206 · 2022: 216 · 2021: 213 · 2020: 187 · 2019: 130 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 32
- FWCI
- 110.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH (R01AG045043, PCORI-1306-01500, U24NR014637)
- VA HSR&D (11-110-2)
- American Cancer Society (19659)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Keywords
- advance care planning, consensus definition, adults, advance directives, shared decision-making, patient values, treatment preferences, serious illness, chronic disease, surrogate decision-making
- MeSH terms
- Interdisciplinary Research, Adult, Chronic Disease, Decision Making, Delphi Technique, Female, Humans, Male, Terminology as Topic, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Advance Care Planning, Internationality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review