Cited by 83Machine Learning in HealthcareBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Machine Learning Methods to Extract Documentation of Breast Cancer Symptoms From Electronic Health Records

Open access
Forsyth, Alexander W., Barzilay, Regina, Hughes, Kevin S., Lui, Dickson, Lorenz, Karl A., Enzinger, Andrea, Tulsky, James A., Lindvall, Charlotta·2018·Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Abstract

Context Clinicians document cancer patients' symptoms in free-text format within electronic health record visit notes. Although symptoms are critically important to quality of life and often herald clinical status changes, computational methods to assess the trajectory of symptoms over time are woefully underdeveloped. Objectives To create machine learning algorithms capable of extracting patient-reported symptoms from free-text electronic health record notes. Methods The data set included 103,564 sentences obtained from the electronic clinical notes of 2695 breast cancer patients receiving paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy at two academic cancer centers between May 1996 and May 2015. We manually annotated 10,000 sentences and trained a conditional random field model to predict words indicating an active symptom (positive label), absence of a symptom (negative label), or no symptom at all (neutral label). Sentences labeled by human coder were divided into training, validation, and test data sets. Final model performance was determined on 20% test data unused in model development or tuning. Results The final model achieved precision of 0.82, 0.86, and 0.99 and recall of 0.56, 0.69, and 1.00 for positive, negative, and neutral symptom labels, respectively. The most common positive symptoms were pain, fatigue, and nausea. Machine-based labeling of 103,564 sentences took two minutes. Conclusion We demonstrate the potential of machine learning to gather, track, and analyze symptoms experienced by cancer patients during chemotherapy. Although our initial model requires further optimization to improve the performance, further model building may yield machine learning methods suitable to be deployed in routine clinical care, quality improvement, and research applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.02.016

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI has been applied in various domains of healthcare including cancer research, cardiology, diabetes, mental health, identification of prognosis, Alzheimer's disease, identification of difference in clinical groups, cardiovascular disease, and stroke-related studies.

    “AI has been put in application in various domains of healthcare [83–87] which includes cancer research [88], cardiology [89], diabetes [90], mental health [91], identification of prognosis [92], identification of Alzheimer's disease [93], identification of difference in the clinical groups [94], identification of cardiovascular disease [39], stroke-related studies [95], etc.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forsyth, A. W., Barzilay, R., Hughes, K. S., Lui, D., Lorenz, K. A., Enzinger, A., Tulsky, J. A., & Lindvall, C.
Affiliations
  • MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Waitemata District Health Board (NZ)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Lindvall, Charlotta
Venue
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
55
Issue
6
Pages
1492-1499
ISSN
0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2787969497
Cited by
83
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (U24NR014637)
  • National Palliative Care Research Center
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
breast cancer, patient-reported symptoms, symptom extraction, electronic health records, clinical notes, paclitaxel chemotherapy, conditional random fields, natural language processing, symptom trajectories, fatigue, pain, nausea
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic, Breast Neoplasms, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nausea, Pain, Cohort Studies, Paclitaxel, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review