Machine Learning Methods to Extract Documentation of Breast Cancer Symptoms From Electronic Health Records
Open accessAbstract
Context Clinicians document cancer patients' symptoms in free-text format within electronic health record visit notes. Although symptoms are critically important to quality of life and often herald clinical status changes, computational methods to assess the trajectory of symptoms over time are woefully underdeveloped. Objectives To create machine learning algorithms capable of extracting patient-reported symptoms from free-text electronic health record notes. Methods The data set included 103,564 sentences obtained from the electronic clinical notes of 2695 breast cancer patients receiving paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy at two academic cancer centers between May 1996 and May 2015. We manually annotated 10,000 sentences and trained a conditional random field model to predict words indicating an active symptom (positive label), absence of a symptom (negative label), or no symptom at all (neutral label). Sentences labeled by human coder were divided into training, validation, and test data sets. Final model performance was determined on 20% test data unused in model development or tuning. Results The final model achieved precision of 0.82, 0.86, and 0.99 and recall of 0.56, 0.69, and 1.00 for positive, negative, and neutral symptom labels, respectively. The most common positive symptoms were pain, fatigue, and nausea. Machine-based labeling of 103,564 sentences took two minutes. Conclusion We demonstrate the potential of machine learning to gather, track, and analyze symptoms experienced by cancer patients during chemotherapy. Although our initial model requires further optimization to improve the performance, further model building may yield machine learning methods suitable to be deployed in routine clinical care, quality improvement, and research applications.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI has been applied in various domains of healthcare including cancer research, cardiology, diabetes, mental health, identification of prognosis, Alzheimer's disease, identification of difference in clinical groups, cardiovascular disease, and stroke-related studies.
“AI has been put in application in various domains of healthcare [83–87] which includes cancer research [88], cardiology [89], diabetes [90], mental health [91], identification of prognosis [92], identification of Alzheimer's disease [93], identification of difference in the clinical groups [94], identification of cardiovascular disease [39], stroke-related studies [95], etc.”
From Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Analytics in m-Health: A Healthcare System Perspective (2020) · cites this paper as [88]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Early Palliative Care for Patients with Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Temel, J. S., Greer, J. A., Muzikansky, A., Gallagher, E. R., Admane, S., Jackson, V. A., Dahlin, C. M., Blinderman, C. D., Jacobsen, J., Pirl, W. F., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1000678 · Cited by 7,482 · see citing works
Mitchell, A. J., Chan, M., Bhatti, H., Halton, M., Grassi, L., Johansen, C., & Meader, N. (2011) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70002-x · Cited by 2,449 · see citing works
Basch, E., Deal, A. M., Dueck, A. C., Scher, H. I., Kris, M. G., Hudis, C., & Schrag, D. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.7156 · Cited by 2,302 · see citing works
Kessler, R. C., Warner, C. H., Ivany, C., Petukhova, M. V., Rose, S., Bromet, E. J., Brown, M., Cai, T., Colpe, L. J., Cox, K. L., et al. (2015) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1754 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Natural Language Processing in Oncology: A Review
Yim, W.-W., Yetisgen, M., Harris, W. P., & Kwan, S. W. (2016) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0213 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Clinical text data in machine learning: systematic review
Spasic, I., & Nenadic, G. (2020) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/17984 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Applications of Machine Learning in Real-Life Digital Health Interventions: Review of the Literature
Triantafyllidis, A. K., & Tsanas, A. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/12286 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
khan, Z. F., & Alotaibi, S. R. (2020) · Journal of Healthcare Engineering · doi:10.1155/2020/8894694 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
- Authors
- Forsyth, A. W., Barzilay, R., Hughes, K. S., Lui, D., Lorenz, K. A., Enzinger, A., Tulsky, J. A., & Lindvall, C.
- Affiliations
- MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Waitemata District Health Board (NZ)
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lindvall, Charlotta
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1492-1499
- ISSN
- 0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2787969497
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Institute of Nursing Research (U24NR014637)
- National Palliative Care Research Center
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- breast cancer, patient-reported symptoms, symptom extraction, electronic health records, clinical notes, paclitaxel chemotherapy, conditional random fields, natural language processing, symptom trajectories, fatigue, pain, nausea
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic, Breast Neoplasms, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nausea, Pain, Cohort Studies, Paclitaxel, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review