Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 281

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

International Standards for Pediatric Palliative Care: From IMPaCCT to GO-PPaCS

Open access
Benini, Franca, Papadatou, Danai, Bernadá, Mercedes, Craig, Finella, De Zen, Lucia, Downing, Julia, Drake, Ross, Friedrichsdorf, Stefan, Garros, Daniel, Giacomelli, Luca, Lacerda, Ana, Lazzarin, Pierina, Marceglia, Sara, Marston, Joan, Muckaden, Mary Ann, Papa, Simonetta, Parravicini, Elvira, Pellegatta, Federico, Wolfe, Joanne·2022·Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Abstract

CONTEXT: Since the publication of the IMPaCCT project in 2007, much effort has been made to develop new approaches to pediatric palliative care (PPC). Fifteen years later, it is time to redefine the standards in PPC. OBJECTIVES: An international group of experts in PPC has revised the standards in PPC through the GO-PPaCS project (Global Overview - PPC Standards). The goal was to update the PPC standards considering the specificity of different settings, resources, and emerging challenges. The present document is intended to reach all people directly or indirectly involved in PPC. METHODS: A literature review in MEDLINE was conducted to expand on the fundamental points and current standards on PPC and to cover an international setting. The literature search (updated on the 15th of April 2021) was carried out using different combinations of keywords and focusing on papers published in English over the past 5 years (2016-2020), but older articles were considered when relevant. The consensus on the fundamental points, standards of care and paper contents was reached by open discussion. RESULTS: Fundamental points were defined regarding the definition of PPC, eligibility criteria and the magnitude of the need for PPC, while standards were redefined for the following six areas: 1) clinical, developmental, psychological, social, ethical and spiritual needs; 2) end-of-life care; 3) care models and settings of care; 4) PPC in humanitarian emergencies; 5) care tools; and 6) education and training for healthcare providers. CONCLUSION: The present document, developed with the contribution of an international group of experts from different countries, experiences and models of care, provides fundamental points and standards for a wider implementation of PPC worldwide.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.031

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 281

Metadata

Authors
Benini, F., Papadatou, D., Bernadá, M., Craig, F., De Zen, L., Downing, J., Drake, R., Friedrichsdorf, S., Garros, D., Giacomelli, L., Lacerda, A., Lazzarin, P., Marceglia, S., Marston, J., Muckaden, M. A., Papa, S., Parravicini, E., Pellegatta, F., & Wolfe, J.
Venue
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
63
Issue
5
Pages
e529-e543
ISSN
0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4205709814
Cited by
281
References
50
FWCI
44.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International Standards for Pediatric Palliative Care: From IMPaCCT to GO-PPaCS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.031
The paper
Benini, F., Papadatou, D., Bernadá, M., Craig, F., De Zen, L., Downing, J., Drake, R., Friedrichsdorf, S., Garros, D., Giacomelli, L., Lacerda, A., Lazzarin, P., Marceglia, S., Marston, J., Muckaden, M. A., Papa, S., Parravicini, E., Pellegatta, F., & Wolfe, J. (2022). International Standards for Pediatric Palliative Care: From IMPaCCT to GO-PPaCS. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.031

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.