Cited by 6Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareFamily Support in Illness

Who, What, Where, and How? The State of Family Science in Pediatric Palliative Care

Broden, Elizabeth G., Boyden, Jackelyn Y., Keller, Susan, James, Richard, Mooney-Doyle, Kim·2024·Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Abstract

Context Families are vital providers and recipients of pediatric palliative care (PPC) services. Understanding the scope and nature of evidence at the intersection of family science and PPC research is necessary to develop family-focused interventions that enhance child and family health. Objectives Explore and describe the family-level impact of pediatric serious illness. Methods We conducted a librarian-assisted scoping review using Arskey and O'Malley's approach. We searched PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases for empirical publications from 2016 to 2021 that focused on families navigating serious pediatric illness published in English. Two reviewers assessed eligibility, with discrepancies resolved by a third. We used Covidence and REDCap for data management and extraction. Results We screened 10,983 abstracts; 309 abstracts were included in full text screening. The final group of 52 citations was analyzed by the entire team. Most research was conducted in Western Europe and North America. The perspectives of parents of children with cancer were most frequently described; voices of seriously ill youth and their siblings were less often presented. Most of the research was descriptive qualitative, followed by descriptive quantitative. Few studies were mixed methods, inferential, or interpretive. Studies most often described parent, youth, and family experience with illness and less often explored family processes and relationships. Irrespective of the approach (i.e…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.06.022

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Broden, E. G., Boyden, J. Y., Keller, S., James, R., & Mooney-Doyle, K.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Children's National (US)
  • Nemours Children's Health System (US)
Corresponding author
Broden, Elizabeth G.
Venue
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-10
Volume
68
Issue
4
Pages
e254-e279
ISSN
0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400438754
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
pediatric palliative care, family science, family intervention, family impact, parental attitudes, childhood cancer, family processes, health equity, research priorities
MeSH terms
Child, Family, Humans, Palliative Care, Pediatrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review