Cited by 36Analytical Methods in PharmaceuticalsAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

Simultaneous determination of Ciprofloxacin and the active metabolite of Prulifloxacin in aqueous human humor by high-performance liquid chromatography

Pellegrino, Roberto Maria, Segoloni, Fabio, Cagini, Carlo·2008·Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis

Abstract

A rapid and simple method for determining two fluoroquinolones (FQNs), namely Ciprofloxacin and Ulifloxacin, this being the last active metabolite of Prulifloxacin, in aqueous human humor (AHH) has been developed and validated. The calibration data resulted linearly correlated in the 4-500 ng/mL concentration range with 8 ng/mL lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) for Ciprofloxacin, and 5-600 ng/mL concentration range with 6 ng/mL LOD for Ulifloxacin. The proposed analytic procedure has been validated by testing quality control sample (QCS) of AHH probed with the two FQNs at 10, 50, 500, and 1000 ng/mL concentration values. Validation of the method has been checked by accuracy and precision data of intra-day and long-term experiments. The two FQN concentrations have been measured by HPLC technique with UV detection at 278-nm wavelength for the AHH of patients to whom were supplied oral doses of FQNs (500 mg) twice in a day, within 1-24h before the surgery intervention of cataract. The average concentration of Ciprofloxacin resulted 186 ng/mL and that of Ulifloxacin 78 ng/mL. The nice quality of the proposed analytic procedure means that it may be suitable for in vivo studies of pharmacokinetics regarding these substances in the AHH medium.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpba.2008.01.043

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Pellegrino, R. M., Segoloni, F., & Cagini, C.
Affiliations
University of Perugia (IT)
Corresponding author
Pellegrino, Roberto Maria
Venue
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
567-574
ISSN
0731-7085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004894153
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Università degli Studi di Perugia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Keywords
ciprofloxacin, fluoroquinolones, aqueous humor, ocular pharmacokinetics, cataract surgery, simultaneous determination, method validation, UV detection
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aqueous Humor, Calibration, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Ciprofloxacin, Dioxolanes, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Piperazines, Reproducibility of Results, Fluoroquinolones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review