Cited by 25Traditional Chinese Medicine AnalysisAnalytical Methods in PharmaceuticalsPhytochemistry and Biological Activities

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Simultaneous determination of nine major active compounds in Dracocephalum rupestre by HPLC

Ren, Dong-Mei, Qu, Zhi, Wang, Xiao-Ning, Shi, Jing, Lou, Hong-Xiang·2008·Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis

Abstract

A new method was developed for the simultaneous determination of nine major constituents in Dracocephalum rupestre, including 5,7-dihydroxychromone (1), eriodictyol-7-O-beta-d-glucoside (2), luteolin-7-O-beta-d-glucoside (3), naringenin-7-O-beta-d-glucoside (4), apigenin-7-O-beta-d-glucoside (5), eriodictyol (6), luteolin (7), naringenin (8) and apigenin (9). The quantitative determination was conducted by reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detector (LC-PDA). Separation was performed on an Agilent Eclipse XDB-C(18) column (150 mm x 4.6 mm i.d., 5 microm) with gradient elution of acetonitrile and 0.5% aqueous acetic acid. The components were identified by retention time, ultraviolet (UV) spectra and quantified by LC-PDA at 260 nm. All calibration curves showed good linearity (r(2)>0.999) within test ranges. The reproducibility was evaluated by intra- and inter-day assays and R.S.D. values were less than 3.0%. The recoveries were between 95.15 and 104.45%. The limits of detection (LOD) ranged from 0.002 to 0.422 microg/ml and limits of quantification (LOQ) ranged from 0.005 to 1.208 microg/ml, respectively. The identity of the peaks was further confirmed by high-performance liquid chromatography with triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry system coupled with electrospray ionization (ESI) interface. The developed method was applied to the determination of nine constituents in 14 samples of D. rupestre collected at various harvesting times. M…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpba.2008.09.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Wu, 1977, vol. 65, no. 2
  2. Jiangsu New Medical College, Dictionary of Chinese Traditional Medicine, Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai, 1977, p. 1347.
  3. Ren, 2005, Chin. Pharm. J., 22, 1695
  4. Ren, 2007, J. Chromatogr. A, 1161, 334, 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.06.034 · DOI
  5. Ren, 2008, Phytochemistry, 69, 1425, 10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.01.013 · DOI
  6. Han, 2008, Eur. J. Pharmacol., 581, 47, 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.11.048 · DOI
  7. Vaughn, 1995, J. Chem. Ecol., 21, 107, 10.1007/BF02036645 · DOI
  8. Areias, 2001, Biochem. Pharmacol., 62, 111, 10.1016/S0006-2952(01)00621-9 · DOI
  9. Kanno, 2006, Toxicol. Lett., 166, 131, 10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.06.005 · DOI
  10. Lee, 2001, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 284, 681, 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5001 · DOI
  11. Tsuji, 2008, Chem. Biol. Interact., 171, 37, 10.1016/j.cbi.2007.08.007 · DOI
  12. Chen, 2007, Life Sci., 81, 1602, 10.1016/j.lfs.2007.09.028 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Shukla, 2008, Free Rad. Biol. Med., 44, 1833, 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.02.007 · DOI
  14. Basilea, 1999, Phytochemistry, 52, 1479, 10.1016/S0031-9422(99)00286-1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ren, D.-M., Qu, Z., Wang, X.-N., Shi, J., & Lou, H.-X.
Affiliations
Shandong University (CN)
Venue
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
1441-1445
ISSN
0731-7085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052443826
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Shandong University
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry and Biological Activities
Keywords
flavonoids, luteolin-7-O-glucoside, apigenin-7-O-glucoside, eriodictyol, luteolin, naringenin, apigenin, simultaneous determination, quality control, harvest time, flavonoid accumulation, HPLC method development
MeSH terms
Calibration, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Chromones, Drug Stability, Drugs, Chinese Herbal, Glucosides, Medicine, Chinese Traditional, Plant Extracts, Quality Control, Reference Standards, Seasons, Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet, Temperature, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Molecular Structure, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization, Plant Components, Aerial, Flavanones, Apigenin, Luteolin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review