Recent Advances in LC–MS Based Characterization of Protein‐Based Bio‐Therapeutics—Mastering Analytical Challenges Posed by the Increasing Format Complexity
Abstract
Alongside the success of protein-based bio-therapeutics over the last decades and facilitated by advances both in protein engineering and manufacturing, new product formats progressively enter into the biopharmaceutical industry's pipelines with major implications on the analytical methods used for their characterization. While conventional approaches have proved sufficient for standard (IgG-like) molecules, the increased complexity of novel formats requires proper adjustments of the employed methodologies, in particular with regard to separation-based techniques coupled to UV/FLD detection. After introducing the status quo for the characterization of biopharmaceuticals in quality control settings, this review provides a comprehensive portrayal of emerging LC-MS based technologies, which have already demonstrated their potential to complement the existing analytical toolbox. In this context, the benefits of native LC-MS and two-/multidimensional LC-MS applications to assess product attributes while preserving the higher-order structure are discussed based on challenges arising from the analysis of complex product formats.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chromatography coupled with a suitable detector can efficiently identify CQAs such as charge variants, size variants and glycosylation patterns.
“Chromatography coupled with a suitable detector can efficiently identify CQAs such as charge variants, size variants and glycosylation patterns [83].”
From Current PAT Landscape in the Downstream Processing of Biopharmaceuticals (2025) · cites this paper as [83]
Cites
Alternative molecular formats and therapeutic applications for bispecific antibodies
Spiess, C., Zhai, Q., & Carter, P. J. (2015) · Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2015.01.003 · Cited by 607 · see citing works
Native Mass Spectrometry: What is in the Name?
Leney, A. C., & Heck, A. J. R. (2017) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1007/s13361-016-1545-3 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Alt, N., Zhang, T. Y., Motchnik, P., Taticek, R., Quarmby, V., Schlothauer, T., Beck, H., Emrich, T., & Harris, R. J. (2016) · Biologicals · doi:10.1016/j.biologicals.2016.06.005 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Online Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry for Top-Down Proteomics
Chen, B., Peng, Y., Valeja, S. G., Xiu, L., Alpert, A. J., & Ge, Y. (2016) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04285 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Chen, B., Lin, Z., Alpert, A. J., Fu, C., Zhang, Q., Pritts, W. A., & Ge, Y. (2018) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01865 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Current PAT Landscape in the Downstream Processing of Biopharmaceuticals
Sathiyapriyan, P., Mukherjee, S., Vogel, T., Essen, L., Boerema, D., Vey, M., & Kalina, U. (2025) · Analytical Science Advances · doi:10.1002/ansa.70013 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
- Authors
- Graf, T., Heinrich, K., Grunert, I., Wegele, H., Haberger, M., Bulau, P., & Leiss, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-07
- Volume
- 186
- Pages
- 113251
- ISSN
- 0731-7085
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review