Facile synthesis of α-MnO2 nanorods for high-performance alkaline batteries
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Absorption bands at 1440, 1609, and 1530 cm−1 in NCSe are due to bending vibrations of -OH groups combined with Ni and Co atoms.
“Moreover, absorption bands appeared at 1440 cm− 1, 1609 cm− 1 and 1530 cm− 1 are because of bending vibrations of -OH groups combined with Ni and Co atoms [60,61].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 102
- Authors
- Tang, N., Tian, X., Yang, C., Pi, Z., & Han, Q.
- Affiliations
- China University of Geosciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Tian, Xike
- Venue
- Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 258-262
- ISSN
- 0022-3697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972786315
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced battery technologies research
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
- Keywords
- α-MnO2 nanorods, manganese dioxide, alkaline batteries, hydrothermal synthesis, permanganate reduction, redox reactions, single-crystalline nanostructures, discharge capacity, electrolytic manganese dioxide, electrochemical properties, specific surface area
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
