Cited by 249Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accelerating advanced MRI reconstructions on GPUs

Open access
Stone, S.S., Haldar, J.P., Tsao, S.C., Hwu, W.-m.W., Sutton, B.P., Liang, Z.-P.·2008·Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing

Abstract

Computational acceleration on graphics processing units (GPUs) can make advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction algorithms attractive in clinical settings, thereby improving the quality of MR images across a broad spectrum of applications. This paper describes the acceleration of such an algorithm on NVIDIA's Quadro FX 5600. The reconstruction of a 3D image with 128(3) voxels achieves up to 180 GFLOPS and requires just over one minute on the Quadro, while reconstruction on a quad-core CPU is twenty-one times slower. Furthermore, relative to the true image, the error exhibited by the advanced reconstruction is only 12%, while conventional reconstruction techniques incur error of 42%.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpdc.2008.05.013

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. S. Stone, H. Yi, J. Haldar, W. Hwu, B. Sutton, Z. Liang, How GPUs can improve the quality of magnetic resonance imaging, in: First Workshop on General Purpose Processing on Graphics Processing Units, GPGPU, 2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stone, S. S., Haldar, J. P., Tsao, S. C., Hwu, W.-M. W., Sutton, B. P., & Liang, Z.-P.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Stone, S.S.
Venue
Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-10
Volume
68
Issue
10
Pages
1307-1318
ISSN
0743-7315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036343507
Cited by
249
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 25
FWCI
17.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Keywords
MRI reconstruction, GPU acceleration, graphics processing units, parallel computing, 3D image reconstruction, computational acceleration, reconstruction error, CPU vs GPU performance comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review