Compliance with the Gluten-Free Diet: The Role of Locus of Control in Celiac Disease
Abstract
Objectives To verify whether subjects with celiac disease (CD) have a different locus of control (LoC) compared with healthy subjects, and to evaluate the relationship between LoC and compliance with a prescribed gluten-free diet (GFD) and quality of life (QoL). Study design We studied 156 subjects on a GFD (mean age, 10 years) and 353 healthy controls (mean age, 12 years). All subjects completed tests on the Nowicki-Strickland Locus of Control Scale; the subjects with CD also completed a questionnaire to measure compliance with dietary treatment and the disease's impact on QoL. Results There was no difference in LoC values between patients with CD and controls. Subjects with CD with good dietary compliance had a more internal LoC compared with those who were not compliant (P = .01). Patients who reported a satisfactory QoL had a more internal LoC compared with those who reported negative affects on QoL due to CD (P = .01). Conclusions Our study confirms the usefulness of the LoC concept for identifying those patients who might be at risk for dietary transgression. Given the enhanced, psychological, and social well being that can result from adherence to a GFD, educational and psychological support can help internalize the LoC in those patients at risk for dietary transgression.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nine studies found similar health-related quality of life in children with celiac disease as in control children.
“Nine of these studies found similar HRQOL in children with CD as in control children (4, 82, 95, 96, 99, 100, 102, 103, 106).”
From ESPGHAN Position Paper on Management and Follow-up of Children and Adolescents With Celiac Disease. (2022) · cites this paper as [4]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ESPGHAN Position Paper on Management and Follow-up of Children and Adolescents With Celiac Disease.
Mearin, M. L., Agardh, D., Antunes, H., Al‐toma, A., Auricchio, R., Castillejo, G., Catassi, C., Ciacci, C., Discepolo, V., Dolinsek, J., et al. (2022) · Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000003540 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Mager, D. R., Marcon, M., Brill, H., Liu, A., Radmanovich, K., Mileski, H., Nasser, R., Alzaben, A., Carroll, M. W., Yap, J., et al. (2018) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000001873 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bellini, A., Zanchi, C., Martelossi, S., Di Leo, G., Not, T., & Ventura, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Trieste (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Not, Tarcisio
- Venue
- The Journal of Pediatrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 463-466.e5
- ISSN
- 0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048052292
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Keywords
- celiac disease, gluten-free diet, dietary adherence, locus of control, internal locus of control, quality of life, psychological support, children
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Age Factors, Celiac Disease, Child, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Italy, Male, Patient Compliance, Quality of Life, Case-Control Studies, Diet, Gluten-Free
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review