Cited by 42Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes and associated disorders

Prevalence of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Ahmet, Alexandra, Dagenais, Simon, Barrowman, Nick J., Collins, Catherine J., Lawson, Margaret L.·2011·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Objectives To determine the prevalence of nocturnal hypoglycemia (NH) in pediatric type 1 diabetes, to compare the prevalence of NH detected by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG), and to compare the prevalence of NH using different thresholds. Study design Twenty-five patients wore a continuous glucose monitor for 3 nights and also conducted SMBG. NH was defined with three thresholds: (1) Results The prevalence of NH with CGM was 68%, 52%, and 48% with the different thresholds. Of the 35 episodes of NH detected by CGM, 25 were not symptomatic and therefore not detected by SMBG. The mean difference in blood glucose between CGM and SMBG was -0.18 mmol/L (P = .35). Conclusions This pilot study suggests that the prevalence of NH in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes with conventional treatment may be as high as 68%, although this varied according to the method of detection and threshold used. Patients may benefit from CGM to detect asymptomatic NH.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.01.064

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Continuous glucose monitoring is most appropriate for highly motivated patients with type 1 diabetes who are willing to wear the monitoring device, and those with continuous poor control during intensive insulin therapy.

    “Therefore, continuous glucose monitoring is most appropriate for highly motivated patients with type 1 diabetes who are willing to wear the monitoring device, and those with continuous poor control during intensive insulin therapy.93”

    From Type 1 diabetes (2014) · cites this paper as [93]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmet, A., Dagenais, S., Barrowman, N. J., Collins, C. J., & Lawson, M. L.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Ahmet, Alexandra
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
159
Issue
2
Pages
297-302.e1
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976496039
Cited by
42
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
nocturnal hypoglycemia, type 1 diabetes in children, continuous glucose monitoring, self-monitoring of blood glucose, asymptomatic hypoglycemia, hypoglycemia prevalence
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Child, Circadian Rhythm, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Male, Ontario, Pilot Projects, Risk Factors, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review