Congenital adrenal hyperplasia and the second newborn screen
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of a second newborn screen for congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) in the state of Colorado and report characteristics associated with cases identified on the first versus second screen.Study design Colorado implemented newborn screening for CAH with 17-hydroxyprogesterone beginning August 2000. The first screening is performed within 72 hours of life and the second between 8 and 14 days of life. We compared infants diagnosed on the basis of the first versus second newborn screen.Results The first screen identified 29 cases of which 28 represented classical CAH. The incidence of classical CAH on the first screen was 1:24,766. The second screen identified 17 additional cases, of which 11 represented classical CAH. Combined, the incidence of classical CAH was 1:17,789. The sensitivity of the first screen was 71.79%. The false negative rate of the first screen was 28.2%. In the absence of a second screen, 1:47,824 infants would have been missed. Infants diagnosed on the first screen had higher 17-hydroxyprogesterone values compared with those diagnosed on the second screen (P = .0008).Conclusions The use of a single newborn screen for CAH missed nearly 30% of classical CAH cases in Colorado. Addition of a second screen, therefore, can improve the operating characteristics of the newborn screening program.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Infants ascertained through screening have less severe hyponatremia and shorter hospitalizations.
“Infants ascertained through screening have less severe hyponatremia and shorter hospitalizations (238,242,246,247).”
From Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia—Current Insights in Pathophysiology, Diagnostics, and Management (2022) · cites this paper as [247]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 46
- Authors
- Chan, C. L., McFann, K., Taylor, L., Wright, D., Zeitler, P. S., & Barker, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Children's Hospital Colorado (US)
- Colorado School of Public Health (US)
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chan, Christine L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pediatrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 109-113.e1
- ISSN
- 0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040071231
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 1.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32DK063687)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
- Keywords
- congenital adrenal hyperplasia, newborn screening, second screening, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, screening sensitivity, false negative rate, screening incidence, Colorado
- MeSH terms
- Adrenal Hyperplasia, Congenital, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Neonatal Screening
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review