Development and Testing of a 3-Item Screening Tool for Problematic Internet Use
Open accessAbstract
Objective To develop and validate the Problematic and Risky Internet Use Screening Scale (PRIUSS)-3 screening scale, a short scale to screen for Problematic Internet Use.Study design This scale development study applied standard processes using separate samples for training and testing datasets. We recruited participants from schools and colleges in 6 states and 2 countries. We selected 3 initial versions of a PRIUSS-3 using correlation to the PRIUSS-18 score. We evaluated these 3 potential screening scales for conceptual coherence, factor loading, sensitivity, and specificity. We selected a 3-item screening tool and evaluated it in 2 separate testing sets using receiver operating curves.Results Our study sample included 1079 adolescents and young adults. The PRIUSS-3 included items addressing anxiety when away from the Internet, loss of motivation when on the Internet, and feelings of withdrawal when away from the Internet. This screening scale had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 69%. A score of ≥3 on the PRIUSS-3 was the threshold to follow up with the PRIUSS-18.Discussion Similar to other clinical screening tools, the PRIUSS-3 can be administered quickly in a clinical or research setting. Positive screens should be followed by administering the full PRIUSS-18. Given the pervasive presence of the Internet in youth's lives, screening and counseling for Problematic Internet Use can be facilitated by use of this validated screening tool.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The PMUM and PRIUSS are validated, reliable questionnaires that assess the level of problematic media symptomatology among school-aged children and teens, respectively.
“These tools are validated, reliable questionnaires that assess the level of problematic media symptomatology among school-aged children and teens, respectively.”
From Digital Ecosystems, Children, and Adolescents: Technical Report (2026) · cites this paper as [334]
The Methods > Measures section describes the PRIUSS-18 as a validated screening scale for problematic Internet use, and the Introduction says it was validated for adolescents and young adults. The paper does not address the PMUM or its use among school-aged children; it also does not establish that both questionnaires are reliable measures of broader problematic media symptoms. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Moreno, M. A., Arseniev-Koehler, A., & Selkie, E.
- Affiliations
- Seattle Children's Research Institute (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Moreno, Megan A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pediatrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 176
- Pages
- 167-172.e1
- ISSN
- 0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5636184
- OpenAlex
- W2468657212
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 10.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Seattle Children's Research Institute
- Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin Research Institute
- National Institutes of Health
- Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA031580)
- NIH Office of the Director
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Keywords
- problematic internet use, internet addiction, screening scale, adolescents, young adults, scale development, psychometric validation, loss of motivation, withdrawal, sensitivity and specificity
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Female, Humans, Male, Psychological Tests, Behavior, Addictive, Internet, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review