Cited by 64Acne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsObesity, Physical Activity, DietDiet, Metabolism, and Disease

Daily intake of soft drinks and moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris in Chinese adolescents

Huang, Xiaoyan, Zhang, Jianglin, Li, Jie, Zhao, Shuang, Xiao, Yi, Huang, Yuzhou, Jing, Danrong, Chen, Liping +7 more·2019·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Objectives To investigate the association of soft drink consumption and the intake of sugar from soft drinks with the prevalence of acne in adolescents. Study design This was a university-based epidemiologic investigation that included 8226 students who underwent health examinations and a questionnaire survey inquiring about the intake of soft drinks. Skin diseases were diagnosed by certificated dermatologists during the health examination. Two-level logistic and generalized additive models were used to estimate the associations, and aORs were presented as the effect size. Results A total of 8197 student survey responses were analyzed. Frequent intake (≥7 times per week) of carbonated sodas (aOR 1.61, 95% CI 0.96-2.72), sweetened tea drinks (aOR 2.52, 95% CI 1.43-4.43), and fruit-flavored drinks (aOR 1.90, 95% CI 1.18-3.07) was associated with moderate-to-severe acne after adjustments for confounders. The occasional intake of fruit-flavored drinks (1-2 times per week) had a weak protective effect on acne (aOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74-0.99). The intake of sugar from any soft drinks showed a nonlinear association with acne (P Conclusions Daily soft drink consumption significantly increases the risk of moderate-to-severe acne in adolescents, especially when the sugar intake from any type of soft drink exceeds 100 g per day.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.08.034

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 17.9% (5/28) of observational studies exclusively assessed the association between GI/glycemic load and acne.

    “Overall, 17.9% (5/28) of the observational studies exclusively assessed the association between GI/glycemic load and acne (Table I).19, 20, 21, 22, 23”

    From Diet and acne: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [23]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, X., Zhang, J., Li, J., Zhao, S., Xiao, Y., Huang, Y., Jing, D., Chen, L., Zhang, X., Su, J., Kuang, Y., Zhu, W., Chen, M., Chen, X., & Shen, M.
Affiliations
Central South University (CN)
Corresponding author
Shen, Minxue
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
204
Pages
256-262.e3
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2893657513
Cited by
64
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of People's Republic of China (2015FY111100, 2016YFC0900802)
  • Department of Science and Technology of Hunan Province (2018SK2086)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
Keywords
soft drink consumption, acne, adolescents, sugar consumption, skin diseases, Chinese adolescents
MeSH terms
Dietary Sugars, Acne Vulgaris, Adolescent, Carbonated Beverages, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Asian People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review