The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fabrication of MgO nanostructures and its efficient photocatalytic, antibacterial and anticancer performance
Abstract
Magnesium oxide (MgO) nanostructures were prepared using microwave-assisted (M 1) and hydrothermal (M 2) methods and characterized by XRD, SEM and FT-IR. It exhibits cubic structure with an average crystallite size of 20 nm (M 1) and 14 nm (M 2) and the lattice strain (WH plot) is 0.0017 (M 1), 0.0037 (M 2). It's spherical and rods like structures are confirmed through SEM and TEM. The vibrational stretching mode of MgO is 439 (M 1) and 449 cm-1 (M 2). The optical bandgap is estimated as 5.93 eV (M 1) and 5.85 eV (M 2) through UV-Vis spectra. The fluorescence spectrum shows emission peaks at 414 and 437 (M 1) and 367 and 385 nm (M 2). The photodegradation studies of MgO nanostructures were assessed by monitoring the decolorization of methylene blue and Congo red dyes in aqueous solution under sunlight irradiation. The antibacterial activities of M 1 and M 2 are investigated against the gram-negative (Escherichia coli, Shigella flexneri, Salmonella typhi, Proteus mirabilis, Aeromonas hydrophila and Vibrio cholera) and gram-positive (Bacillus subtilis and Rhodococcus rhodochrous) bacteria. The zone of inhibition of 24 (M 1) and 25 mm (M 2) indicates high antibacterial activity towards the gram negative bacterium A. hydrophila. Confocal laser scanning microscopic (CLSM) analysis was utilized for understanding the variation in antibacterial activity between different orientations of MgO nanostructures. The cytotoxicity assay confirmed that the prepared nanostructures are non - toxic to normal healthy RBC's. In-vitro anticancer efficiency (IC50) of MgO nanostructures against human lung cancer cell line (A549) was investigated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Prospects and applications of nanobiotechnology: a medical perspective
Fakruddin, M., Hossain, Z., & Afroz, H. (2012) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/1477-3155-10-31 · Cited by 284
RetractedMosmann, T. (1983) · Journal of Immunological Methods · doi:10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4 · Cited by 56,104
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1102873 · Cited by 11,064
Raghupathi, K. R., Koodali, R. T., & Manna, A. C. (2011) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la104825u · Cited by 2,037
Liqiang, J., Yichun, Q., Baiqi, W., Shudan, L., Baojiang, J., Libin, Y., Wei, F., Honggang, F., & Jiazhong, S. (2006) · Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells · doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2005.11.007 · Cited by 1,942
Development of Nanoparticles for Antimicrobial Drug Delivery
Zhang, L., Pornpattananangkul, D., Hu, C.-M., & Huang, C.-M. (2010) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/092986710790416290 · Cited by 886
Alternative Antimicrobial Approach: Nano-Antimicrobial Materials
Beyth, N., Houri-Haddad, Y., Domb, A., Khan, W., & Hazan, R. (2015) · Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1155/2015/246012 · Cited by 837
Biocompatibility of engineered nanoparticles for drug delivery
Naahidi, S., Jafari, M., Edalat, F., Raymond, K., Khademhosseini, A., & Chen, P. (2013) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.12.013 · Cited by 809
Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery
Han, G., Ghosh, P., & Rotello, V. M. (2007) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/17435889.2.1.113 · Cited by 506
CHEN, M., & VONMIKECZ, A. (2005) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.12.021 · Cited by 493
Cited by
Microstructure, optical and photocatalytic properties of MgO nanoparticles
Balakrishnan, G., Velavan, R., Mujasam Batoo, K., & Raslan, E. H. (2020) · Results in Physics · doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103013 · Cited by 394
Nanostructured metal oxides and its hybrids for photocatalytic and biomedical applications
Kannan, K., Radhika, D., Sadasivuni, K. K., Reddy, K. R., & Raghu, A. V. (2020) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2020.102178 · Cited by 341
Heidari, M. R., Varma, R. S., Ahmadian, M., Pourkhosravani, M., Asadzadeh, S. N., Karimi, P., & Khatami, M. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9050963 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Karthik, K., Dhanuskodi, S., Gobinath, C., Prabukumar, S., & Sivaramakrishnan, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 190
- Pages
- 8-20
- ISSN
- 1011-1344 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2901627499
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 9.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fabrication of MgO nanostructures and its efficient photocatalytic, antibacterial and anticancer performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.11.001
- The paper
- Karthik, K., Dhanuskodi, S., Gobinath, C., Prabukumar, S., & Sivaramakrishnan, S. (2019). Fabrication of MgO nanostructures and its efficient photocatalytic, antibacterial and anticancer performance. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.11.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.