The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Group education, night splinting and home exercises reduce conversion to surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome: a multicentre randomised trial
Open accessAbstract
QUESTION: In people with carpal tunnel syndrome who are waitlisted for surgical consultation, does a therapist-led care pathway involving education, splinting and exercises reduce the need for surgery and improve patient outcomes? DESIGN: A multicentre, randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessment and intention-to-treat analysis. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and five people with electrodiagnostically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome on a waitlist for surgical consultation and recruited from four public hospitals in Australia. INTERVENTIONS: The experimental group (n = 52) received a one-off group session of education, splinting, and nerve and tendon gliding exercises. The control group (n = 53) continued on the waitlist without additional care. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were conversion to surgery by 24 weeks, the global rating of change (GROC) scale and patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included symptom severity and functional limitation. RESULTS: At 24 weeks, conversion to surgery was 59% in the experimental group and 80% in the control group (risk difference -0.21, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.03). More participants in the experimental group identified as improved at 6 weeks (20% vs 4%; risk difference 0.15, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.28) but not at 24 weeks (24% vs 10%; risk difference 0.14, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.29). The intervention was also estimated to be beneficial on some measures of satisfaction, symptom severity and functional limitation. The study's estimates of the benefits came with some uncertainty, which makes it unclear whether the wider population of people awaiting carpal tunnel surgery would consider that the benefits make the intervention worthwhile. No serious adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: A therapist-led pathway reduced conversion to carpal tunnel surgery and increased perceived improvement and satisfaction in people who were already on a waitlist for surgical consultation. REGISTRATION: ACTRN12613001095752.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The marked reduction of participants' intention to undergo surgery (57.5%) is consistent with the recommendation of prioritizing conservative treatments, considering exercise potential to reduce the need for surgery.
“This finding is consistent with the recommendation of prioritizing conservative treatments, considering exercise potential to reduce the need for surgery [85,86] and avoid associated risks [3,4,19,20].”
From Digital Rehabilitation for Elbow Pain Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study (2022) · cites this paper as [85]
The Discussion reports a 21% reduction in conversion to surgery among people awaiting carpal tunnel surgery who received education, night splinting and home exercises. It says this combined pathway warrants consideration, but does not recommend prioritizing conservative treatment generally or establish that exercise alone reduced surgery; it notes that conservative management before surgery is optional under current guidelines. The 57.5% figure describes the citing study's finding, not a result attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewis, K. J., Coppieters, M. W., Ross, L., Hughes, I., Vicenzino, B., & Schmid, A. B.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Griffith University (AU)
- Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital (AU)
- Gold Coast Hospital (AU)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Schmid, Annina B
- Venue
- Journal of physiotherapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97-104
- ISSN
- 1836-9553 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3015906307
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of physiotherapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Department of Health, Queensland
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Peripheral Nerve Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Keywords
- carpal tunnel syndrome, conversion to surgery, night splinting, group education, home-based exercise, patient satisfaction, symptom severity, functional limitations
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Splints, Patient Satisfaction, Physical Therapy Modalities, Intention to Treat Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review