Cited by 139Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceNeural dynamics and brain functionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Neural processes underlying conscious perception: experimental findings and a global neuronal workspace framework

Sergent, Claire, Dehaene, Stanislas·2004·Journal of Physiology-Paris

Abstract

One striking property of perception is that it can be achieved in two seemingly different ways: either consciously or non-consciously. What distinguishes these two types of processing at the neural level? So far, empirical findings suggest that conscious perception is associated with an increase in activity at the sensory level, the specific involvement of a fronto-parietal network and an increase in long-distance functional connectivity and synchrony within a broad network of areas. We interpret these data in the framework of the global neuronal workspace model which proposes that the neural basis of conscious access is a sudden self-amplifying process leading to a global brain-scale pattern of activity. In contradiction with several theories which assume that there is a continuum of perception, associated with a gradual change in the intensity of brain activation, the model predicts a sharp non-linear transition between non-conscious and conscious processing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2005.09.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 139

Authors
Sergent, C., & Dehaene, S.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Sergent, Claire
Venue
Journal of Physiology-Paris
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-07
Volume
98
Issue
4-6
Pages
374-384
ISSN
0928-4257 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037358922
Cited by
139
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Physiology-Paris (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
conscious perception, unconscious processes, frontoparietal network, neuronal synchronization, sensory activities
MeSH terms
Animals, Awareness, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Consciousness, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Neurons, Afferent, Parietal Lobe, Time Factors, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review