Cited by 156Neural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMultisensory perception and integration

Neuronal coherence during selective attentional processing and sensory–motor integration

Womelsdorf, Thilo, Fries, Pascal·2006·Journal of Physiology-Paris

Abstract

Groups of neurons synchronize their activities during a variety of conditions, but whether this synchronization is functionally relevant has remained a matter of debate. Here, we survey recent findings showing that synchronization is dynamically modulated during cognitive processes. Based on this evidence, synchronization appears to reflect a general mechanism that renders interactions among selective subsets of neurons effective. We show that neuronal synchronization predicts which sensory input is processed and how efficient it is transmitted to postsynaptic target neurons during sensory-motor integration. Four lines of evidence are presented supporting the hypothesis that rhythmic neuronal synchronization, also called neuronal coherence, underlies effective and selective neuronal communication. (1) Findings from intracellular recordings strongly suggest that postsynaptic neurons are particularly sensitive to synaptic input that is synchronized in the gamma-frequency (30-90 Hz) range. (2) Neurophysiological studies in awake animals revealed enhanced rhythmic synchronization among neurons encoding task-relevant information. (3) The trial-by-trial variation in the precision of neuronal synchronization predicts part of the trial-by-trial variation in the speed of visuo-motor integration. (4) The planning and selection of specific movements can be predicted by the strength of coherent oscillations among local neuronal groups in frontal and parietal cortex. Thus, neuronal coherence appears as a neuronal substrate of an effective neuronal communication structure that dynamically links neurons into functional groups processing task-relevant information and selecting appropriate actions during attention and effective sensory-motor integration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2007.01.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The encoding of salience or precision can also be understood in terms of synchronous gain and fast oscillatory dynamics associated with binding, attention and dynamic coordination.

    “As noted above, the encoding of salience or precision can also be understood in terms of synchronous gain [30] and fast (oscillatory) dynamics associated with binding, attention and dynamic coordination [4,5].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 124 · Cited by 156

Authors
Womelsdorf, T., & Fries, P.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Womelsdorf, Thilo
Venue
Journal of Physiology-Paris
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-10
Volume
100
Issue
4
Pages
182-193
ISSN
0928-4257 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024415031
Cited by
156
References
124
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Physiology-Paris (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
neuronal synchronization, selective attention, sensorimotor integration, gamma oscillations, visual-motor integration, motor planning, frontal cortex, parietal cortex, trial-to-trial variability, neural communication
MeSH terms
Afferent Pathways, Animals, Attention, Cognition, Cortical Synchronization, Efferent Pathways, Humans, Neurons, Wakefulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review