Behavioral effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induced dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plasticity in alcohol dependence
Abstract
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to reduce acute substance craving in drug addicts, and improve cognition in neuropsychiatric patients. Here we aimed to explore further tDCS induced behavioral and neurophysiological modulation including assessment of relapse rate over a prolonged time course in alcoholism. We examined the effects of repeated anodal tDCS (2mA, 35 cm(2), 20min) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on relapse to the use of alcohol in alcoholics from outpatient services, who received additional routine clinical treatment. Furthermore, event related potentials (ERPs), cognitive and frontal executive processes, craving, depressive and anxiety symptoms were obtained before and after treatment. From thirteen alcoholic subjects, seven were randomized to sham-tDCS and six to real tDCS treatment (once a week for five consecutive weeks). Depressive symptoms and craving were reduced to a larger extent in the tDCS group compared to the sham group (p=0.005 and p=0.015, respectively). On the other hand, active tDCS was able to block the increase in neural activation triggered by alcohol related and neutral cues in prefrontal cortex (PFC) as indexed by ERP as seen in the sham-tDCS group. Finally, there was a trend for increased change in executive function in the tDCS group compared to the sham-tDCS group (p=0.082), and, similarly, a trend for more relapses in the tDCS group compared to sham tDCS (four alcoholic subjects (66.7%) vs. one (14.3%), p=0.053).These results confirm the previous findings of tDCS effects on craving in alcoholism and also extend these findings as we showed also tDCS-related mood improvement. However, potential increase in relapse is possible; thus the clinical value of an increase in craving and improvement in depression and executive function needs to be carefully assessed in further studies; including investigation of optimal parameters of stimulation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
While 3 of the tDCS studies found a decrease in alcohol cravings compared to sham stimulation, one study found a lower relapse rate in the brain stimulation group but with no difference in alcohol cravings at 6-month follow-up.
“While 3 of these studies found a decrease in alcohol cravings compared to sham stimulation [36,44,60], one study found a lower relapse rate in the brain stimulation group but with no difference in alcohol cravings at 6-month follow-up [59].”
From Patient-level interventions to reduce alcohol-related harms in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-summary (2022) · cites this paper as [44]
All 4 studies that used brain stimulation as an intervention were conducted in Brazil, an upper middle-income country.
“As a clear example, all 4 studies [36,44,59,60] that used brain stimulation as an intervention were conducted in Brazil, an upper middle-income country.”
From Patient-level interventions to reduce alcohol-related harms in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-summary (2022) · cites this paper as [44]
Ultimately, 3 of the 4 tDCS studies found more relapses in the intervention group at 4-week, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up.
“Ultimately, 3 of the 4 studies in this group found more relapses in the intervention group at 4-week, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up [44,59,60].”
From Patient-level interventions to reduce alcohol-related harms in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-summary (2022) · cites this paper as [44]
Anodal tDCS targeting the left DLPFC reduced cue-induced alcohol craving and emotional symptoms (e.g., anxiety, depression) compared to sham; however, this form of treatment was associated with a trend toward greater relapse in treatment seeking individuals.
“Anodal tDCS targeting the left DLPFC reduced cue-induced alcohol craving and emotional symptoms (e.g. anxiety, depression) when compared to sham; however, this form of treatment was associated with a trend toward greater relapse in treatment seeking individuals [109].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 94 · Cited by 182
- Authors
- da Silva, M. C., Conti, C. L., Klauss, J., Alves, L. G., do Nascimento Cavalcante, H. M., Fregni, F., Nitsche, M. A., & Nakamura-Palacios, E. M.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (BR)
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
- Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Nakamura-Palacios, Ester Miyuki
- Venue
- Journal of Physiology-Paris
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 493-502
- ISSN
- 0928-4257 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045404720
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 7.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Physiology-Paris (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- GRO (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- transcranial direct current stimulation, alcoholism, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, neuroplasticity, alcohol craving, relapse, event-related potentials, executive function, depression, anxiety, alcohol cues, non-invasive brain stimulation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Alcoholism, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuronal Plasticity, Photic Stimulation, Prospective Studies, Behavior, Addictive, Treatment Outcome, Prefrontal Cortex, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review