The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review on recent progress of nanostructured anode materials for Li-ion batteries
Open accessAbstract
This review highlights the recent research advances in active nanostructured anode materials for the next generation of Li-ion batteries (LIBs). In fact, in order to address both energy and power demands of secondary LIBs for future energy storage applications, it is required the development of innovative kinds of electrodes. Nanostructured materials based on carbon, metal/semiconductor, metal oxides and metal phosphides/nitrides/sulfides show a variety of admirable properties for LIBs applications such as high surface area, low diffusion distance, high electrical and ionic conductivity. Therefore, nanosized active materials are extremely promising for bridging the gap towards the realization of the next generation of LIBs with high reversible capacities, increased power capability, long cycling stability and free from safety concerns. In this review, anode materials are classified, depending on their electrochemical reaction with lithium, into three groups: intercalation/de-intercalation, alloy/de-alloy and conversion materials. Furthermore, the effect of nanoscale size and morphology on the electrochemical performance is presented. Synthesis of the nanostructures, lithium battery performance and electrode reaction mechanisms are also discussed. To conclude, the main aim of this review is to provide an organic outline of the wide range of recent research progresses and perspectives on nanosized active anode materials for future LIBs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Lithium Batteries: Status, Prospects and Future
Scrosati, B., & Garche, J. (2010) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048 · Cited by 5,153
Thackeray, M. M., Wolverton, C., & Isaacs, E. D. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21892e · Cited by 2,515
Cited by
An, S. J., Li, J., Daniel, C., Mohanty, D., Nagpure, S., & Wood, D. L. (2016) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.008 · Cited by 2,121
Progress of enhancing the safety of lithium ion battery from the electrolyte aspect
Wang, Q., Jiang, L., Yu, Y., & Sun, J. (2019) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.035 · Cited by 915
Electrode Degradation in Lithium-Ion Batteries
Pender, J. P., Jha, G., Youn, D. H., Ziegler, J. M., Andoni, I., Choi, E. J., Heller, A., Dunn, B. S., Weiss, P. S., Penner, R. M., et al. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b04365 · Cited by 873
Carbon materials for Li–S batteries: Functional evolution and performance improvement
Liang, J., Sun, Z.-H., Li, F., & Cheng, H.-M. (2016) · Energy Storage Materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2015.09.007 · Cited by 593
A review of current collectors for lithium-ion batteries
Zhu, P., Gastol, D., Marshall, J., Sommerville, R., Goodship, V., & Kendrick, E. (2021) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229321 · Cited by 523
Metadata
- Authors
- Goriparti, S., Miele, E., De Angelis, F., Di Fabrizio, E., Proietti Zaccaria, R., & Capiglia, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Power Sources
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 257
- Pages
- 421-443
- ISSN
- 0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081518165
- Cited by
- 2,092
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 103.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review on recent progress of nanostructured anode materials for Li-ion batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.103
- The paper
- Goriparti, S., Miele, E., De Angelis, F., Di Fabrizio, E., Proietti Zaccaria, R., & Capiglia, C. (2014). Review on recent progress of nanostructured anode materials for Li-ion batteries. Journal of Power Sources. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
