The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the origin of the capacity fading for aluminium negative electrodes in Li-ion batteries
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pure aluminum anode capacity fading is caused by structural damage from excessive volume changes during charge-discharge, leading to crack nucleation and pulverization and loss of electrical contact.
“The causes of this have been extensively studied and include: (i) structural damage from excessive volume changes during the charge–discharge cycle, leading to (ii) crack nucleation and eventual pulverization of the anode, resulting in loss of electrical contact, and (iii) loss of lithium due to diffusion into the bulk or formation of stable AlLi phases [9,10].”
From Solid-State Diffusion Bonding of Aluminum to Copper for Bimetallic Anode Fabrication (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Pure aluminum anode capacity fading is caused by loss of lithium due to diffusion into the bulk or formation of stable AlLi phases.
“The causes of this have been extensively studied and include: (i) structural damage from excessive volume changes during the charge–discharge cycle, leading to (ii) crack nucleation and eventual pulverization of the anode, resulting in loss of electrical contact, and (iii) loss of lithium due to diffusion into the bulk or formation of stable AlLi phases [9,10].”
From Solid-State Diffusion Bonding of Aluminum to Copper for Bimetallic Anode Fabrication (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- Dey, 1971, J. Electrochem. Soc., 118, 1547, 10.1149/1.2407783 · DOI
- Park, 2010, Chem. Soc. Rev., 39, 3115, 10.1039/b919877f · DOI
- Hamon, 2001, J. Power Sources, 97-98, 185, 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00616-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Hudak, 2012, J. Electrochem. Soc., 159, A688, 10.1149/2.023206jes · DOI
- Lei, 2007, J. Alloys Comp., 429, 311, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.04.019 · DOI
- Kumagai, 1992, J. Appl. Electrochem, 22, 620, 10.1007/BF01092610 · DOI
- Gasparotto, 2011, J. Power Sources, 196, 2879, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.104 · DOI
- Besenhard, 1990, Solid State Ion, 40/41, 525, 10.1016/0167-2738(90)90062-V · DOI
- Wang, 2008, J. Electrochem. Soc., 155, A615, 10.1149/1.2943215 · DOI · Paper page
- Lei, 2009, Mater. Chem. Phys., 116, 383, 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.05.041 · DOI
- Zein El Abedin, 2012, Aust. J. Chem., 65, 1529, 10.1071/CH12330 · DOI
- Au, 2010, J. Power Sources, 195, 3333, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.102 · DOI
- Sharma, 2013, Electrochim. Acta, 87, 872, 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.09.028 · DOI
- Liu, 2011, Nano Lett., 11, 4188, 10.1021/nl202088h · DOI
- Rao, 1977, J. Electrochem. Soc., 124, 1490, 10.1149/1.2133098 · DOI
- Frazer, 1981, J. Electroanal. Chem., 121, 329, 10.1016/S0022-0728(81)80588-8 · DOI
- Besenhard, 1978, J. Electroanal. Chem., 94, 77, 10.1016/S0022-0728(78)80400-8 · DOI
- Epelboin, 1980, J. Electrochem. Soc., 127, 2100, 10.1149/1.2129354 · DOI
- Geronov, 1984, J. Power Sources, 12, 145, 10.1016/0378-7753(84)80045-2 · DOI
- Baranski, 1984, J. Electrochem. Soc., 131, 1750, 10.1149/1.2115954 · DOI
- Zlatilova, 1988, J. Power Sources, 24, 71, 10.1016/0378-7753(88)80090-9 · DOI
- Garreau, 1983, J. Power Sources, 9, 235, 10.1016/0378-7753(83)87023-2 · DOI
- Geronov, 1984, Electrochim. Acta, 29, 551, 10.1016/0013-4686(84)87108-X · DOI
- Owen, 1984, Solid State Ion, 13, 329, 10.1016/0167-2738(84)90076-6 · DOI
- Maskell, 1985, J. Electrochem. Soc., 132, 1602, 10.1149/1.2114174 · DOI
- Geronov, 1984, J. Power Sources, 12, 155, 10.1016/0378-7753(84)80046-4 · DOI
- Jow, 1982, J. Electrochem. Soc., 129, 1429, 10.1149/1.2124178 · DOI
- Baranski, 1982, J. Electrochem. Soc., 129, 901, 10.1149/1.2124050 · DOI
- Ui, 2008, J. Power Sources, 183, 347, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.04.063 · DOI
- Riley, 2010, ChemPhysChem, 11, 2124, 10.1002/cphc.201000158 · DOI
- He, 2011, Adv. Mater., 23, 4938, 10.1002/adma.201102568 · DOI
- Oltean, 2011, Electrochim. Acta, 56, 3203, 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.01.053 · DOI
- Masitas, 2012, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134, 5014, 10.1021/ja2108933 · DOI
- Redmond, 2005, Nano Lett., 5, 131, 10.1021/nl048204r · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Solid-State Diffusion Bonding of Aluminum to Copper for Bimetallic Anode Fabrication
de Prado, J., Børresen, B. T., Utrilla, V., & Ureña, A. (2024) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma17215333 · Cited by 6
“…structural damage from excessive volume changes during the charge– discharge cycle, leading to (ii) crack nucleation and eventual pulverization of the anode, resulting in loss of electrical contact, and (iii) loss of lithium due to diffusion into the bulk or formation of stable AlLi phases [9,10].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Oltean, G., Tai, C.-W., Edström, K., & Nyholm, L.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Nyholm, Leif
- Venue
- Journal of Power Sources
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 269
- Pages
- 266-273
- ISSN
- 0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059371965
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Power Sources (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- The Swedish Research council (2011-3506)
- The Ångström Advanced Battery Center (2012-4681)
- StandUp for Energy and The Swedish Energy Agency
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Battery Modeling and Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
- Keywords
- lithium-ion batteries, capacity fade, native oxide, alumina coatings, dealloying, volume expansion, cycling stability, pouch cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
