Cycle ageing analysis of a LiFePO4/graphite cell with dynamic model validations: towards realistic lifetime predictions
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Current rate and DOD dependence on cyclic ageing can be modelled with exponential or polynomial functions.
“The current rate and DOD dependence on cyclic ageing can be modelled with exponential [95,102] or polynomial [102] functions.”
From Data-driven health estimation and lifetime prediction of lithium-ion batteries: A review (2019) · cites this paper as [102]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 91 · Cited by 210
- Authors
- Sarasketa-Zabala, E., Gandiaga, I., Martinez-Laserna, E., Rodriguez-Martinez, L. M., & Villarreal, I.
- Affiliations
- Ikerlan (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Sarasketa-Zabala, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Power Sources
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 275
- Pages
- 573-587
- ISSN
- 0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4250402431
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9
- FWCI
- 12.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2015-10-30)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Power Sources (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- ETORTEK
- EMAITEK Strategic Programs of the Basque Government
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
- Keywords
- LiFePO4/graphite cells, battery degradation, lifetime prediction, state of charge, semi-empirical degradation model, acceleration factor, lithium-ion cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
