Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 478

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Challenges and perspectives of garnet solid electrolytes for all solid-state lithium batteries

Liu, Qi, Geng, Zhen, Han, Cuiping, Fu, Yongzhu, Li, Song, He, Yan-bing, Kang, Feiyu, Li, Baohua·2018·Journal of Power Sources

Abstract

Abstract Garnet Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO) solid electrolytes recently have attracted tremendous interest as they have the potential to enable all solid-state lithium batteries (ASSLBs) owing to high ionic conductivity (10−3 to 10−4 S cm−1), negligible electronic transport, wide potential window (up to 9 V), and good chemical stability. Here we present the key issues and challenges of LLZO in the aspects of ion conduction property, interfacial compatibility, and stability in air. First, different preparation methods of LLZO are reviewed. Then, recent progress about the improvement of ionic conductivity and interfacial property between LLZO and electrodes are presented. Finally, we list some emerging LLZO-based solid-state batteries and provide perspectives for further research. The aim of this review is to summarize the up-to-date developments of LLZO and lead the direction for future development which could enable LLZO-based ASSLBs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.019

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 98 references

Research works printed but not linked: 93

  1. Zuo, 2017, Adv. Mater., 29
  2. Xu, 2018, Carbon, 127, 459, 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.003 · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.003
  3. Fu, 2017, Energy Environ. Sci., 10, 1568, 10.1039/C7EE01004D · doi:10.1039/c7ee01004d
  4. Li, 2017, Adv. Sci., 4
  5. Zhou, 2018, Carbon, 129, 667, 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.12.054 · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2017.12.054
  6. Yang, 2017, Adv. Mater., 29
  7. Hansel, 2016, Nanoscale, 8, 18412, 10.1039/C6NR06955J · doi:10.1039/c6nr06955j
  8. Zhou, 2016, Adv. Energy Mater., 6
  9. Unemoto, 2014, Adv. Funct. Mater., 24, 2267, 10.1002/adfm.201303147 · doi:10.1002/adfm.201303147
  10. Fu, 2016, CrystEngComm, 18, 4236, 10.1039/C6CE00171H · doi:10.1039/c6ce00171h
  11. Lu, 2017, Adv. Mater., 29
  12. Chopade, 2017, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 9, 14561, 10.1021/acsami.7b02514 · doi:10.1021/acsami.7b02514
  13. Cheng, 2017, Adv. Energy Mater., 8
  14. Zhong, 2016, Sci. Rep., 6, 25484, 10.1038/srep25484 · doi:10.1038/srep25484
  15. Liu, 2017, J. Mater. Chem., 5, 11124, 10.1039/C7TA02423A · doi:10.1039/c7ta02423a
  16. Deng, 2017, J. Power Sources, 360, 98, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.006 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.006
  17. Li, 2017, Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 56, 753, 10.1002/anie.201608924 · doi:10.1002/anie.201608924
  18. Sudo, 2014, Solid State Ionics, 262, 151, 10.1016/j.ssi.2013.09.024 · doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2013.09.024
  19. Bates, 1992, Sohd State Iomcs, 53–56, 647
  20. Han, 2016, Adv. Energy Mater., 6
  21. Awaka, 2011, Chem. Lett., 40, 60, 10.1246/cl.2011.60 · doi:10.1246/cl.2011.60
  22. Wang, 2015, Chem. Mater., 27, 6650, 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02429 · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02429
  23. Han, 2012, Chem. Commun., 48, 9840, 10.1039/c2cc35089k · doi:10.1039/c2cc35089k
  24. Jalem, 2013, Chem. Mater., 25, 425, 10.1021/cm303542x · doi:10.1021/cm303542x
  25. Xu, 2012, Phys. Rev. B, 85, 052301, 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.052301 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.85.052301
  26. Xia, 2017, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 100, 2832, 10.1111/jace.14865 · doi:10.1111/jace.14865
  27. Thompson, 2014, J. Mater. Chem., 2, 13431, 10.1039/C4TA02099E · doi:10.1039/c4ta02099e
  28. Jin, 2011, J. Power Sources, 196, 8683, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.05.065 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.05.065
  29. Shao, 2017, Electrochim. Acta, 225, 345, 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.140 · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.140
  30. Chen, 2017, J. Phys. Chem. C, 121, 15565, 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04004 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04004
  31. Rangasamy, 2012, Solid State Ionics, 206, 28, 10.1016/j.ssi.2011.10.022 · doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2011.10.022
  32. Li, 2017, J. Alloy. Comp., 695, 3744, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.277 · doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.277
  33. Wolfenstine, 2012, J. Power Sources, 208, 193, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.031 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.031
  34. Chen, 2018, J. Phys. Chem. C, 122, 1963, 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10911 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10911
  35. Bernstein, 2012, Phys. Rev. Lett., 109, 205702, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.205702 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.205702
  36. Botros, 2016, J. Power Sources, 309, 108, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.01.086 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.01.086
  37. Cheng, 2015, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 7, 2073, 10.1021/am508111r · doi:10.1021/am508111r
  38. Zhang, 2014, J. Power Sources, 268, 960, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.148 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.148
  39. Sakamoto, 2013, Nanotechnology, 24, 424005, 10.1088/0957-4484/24/42/424005 · doi:10.1088/0957-4484/24/42/424005
  40. Mondal, 1999, Solid State Ionics, 118, 331, 10.1016/S0167-2738(98)00452-4 · doi:10.1016/s0167-2738(98)00452-4
  41. Jin, 2013, J. Power Sources, 239, 326, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.155 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.155
  42. Qin, 2018, Appl. Phys. Lett., 112
  43. Mizuno, 2005, J. Electrochem. Soc., 152, A1499, 10.1149/1.1939633 · doi:10.1149/1.1939633
  44. Liu, 2015, J. Power Sources, 282, 286, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.050 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.050
  45. Wang, 2018, J. Power Sources, 377, 7, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.078 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.078
  46. Yamada, 2017, J. Power Sources, 368, 97, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.076 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.076
  47. Luo, 2017, Adv. Mater., 29
  48. Fu, 2017, Sci. Adv., 3
  49. Ma, 2015, Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 54, 129, 10.1002/anie.201408124 · doi:10.1002/anie.201408124
  50. Kang, 2014, J. Phys. Chem. C, 118, 17402, 10.1021/jp504314w · doi:10.1021/jp504314w
  51. Yoo, 2016, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 16, 11662, 10.1166/jnn.2016.13570 · doi:10.1166/jnn.2016.13570
  52. El-Shinawi, 2017, J. Mater. Chem., 5, 319, 10.1039/C6TA06961D · doi:10.1039/c6ta06961d
  53. Baek, 2014, J. Power Sources, 249, 197, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.089 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.089
  54. Kim, 2013, Dalton Trans., 42, 13112, 10.1039/c3dt51795k · doi:10.1039/c3dt51795k
  55. Katsui, 2015, Thin Solid Films, 584, 130, 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.11.094 · doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2014.11.094
  56. Loho, 2016, J. Electrochem. Soc., 164, A6131, 10.1149/2.0201701jes · doi:10.1149/2.0201701jes
  57. Ahn, 2014, J. Electrochem. Soc., 162, A60, 10.1149/2.0411501jes · doi:10.1149/2.0411501jes
  58. Lobe, 2016, J. Power Sources, 307, 684, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.054 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.054
  59. Rosero-Navarro, 2017, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 100, 276, 10.1111/jace.14572 · doi:10.1111/jace.14572
  60. Li, 2013, Solid State Ionics, 253, 76, 10.1016/j.ssi.2013.09.005 · doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2013.09.005
  61. Zhang, 2017, J. Power Sources, 355, 69, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.04.044 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.04.044
  62. Shin, 2017, Solid State Ionics, 301, 10, 10.1016/j.ssi.2017.01.005 · doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2017.01.005
  63. Tadanaga, 2013, Electrochem. Commun., 33, 51, 10.1016/j.elecom.2013.04.004 · doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2013.04.004
  64. Tang, 2017, Mater. Lett., 193, 251, 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.01.134 · doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2017.01.134
  65. Huang, 2016, JOM (J. Occup. Med.), 68, 2593
  66. Li, 2014, J. Power Sources, 248, 642, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.140 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.140
  67. O'Callaghan, 2008, Chem. Mater., 20, 2360, 10.1021/cm703677q · doi:10.1021/cm703677q
  68. Langer, 2015, J. Alloy. Comp., 645, 64, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.03.209 · doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.03.209
  69. Chen, 2014, Solid State Ionics, 265, 7, 10.1016/j.ssi.2014.07.004 · doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2014.07.004
  70. El Shinawi, 2013, J. Power Sources, 225, 13, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.111 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.111
  71. Wolfenstine, 2012, J. Mater. Sci., 47, 4428, 10.1007/s10853-012-6300-y · doi:10.1007/s10853-012-6300-y
  72. Wolfenstine, 2012, Mater. Chem. Phys., 134, 571, 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.03.054 · doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.03.054
  73. Kumazaki, 2011, Electrochem. Commun., 13, 509, 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.02.035 · doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2011.02.035
  74. Xu, 2016, J. Power Sources, 302, 291, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.10.084 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.10.084
  75. Li, 2012, J. Mater. Chem., 22, 15357, 10.1039/c2jm31413d · doi:10.1039/c2jm31413d
  76. Wu, 2016, J. Mater. Chem., 4, 15266, 10.1039/C6TA05439K · doi:10.1039/c6ta05439k
  77. Ren, 2016, J. Materiomics, 2, 256, 10.1016/j.jmat.2016.04.003 · doi:10.1016/j.jmat.2016.04.003
  78. Ahn, 2014, J. Power Sources, 272, 554, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.110 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.110
  79. Huo, 2017, J. Power Sources, 372, 1, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.10.059 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.10.059
  80. Ren, 2015, Electrochem. Commun., 57, 27, 10.1016/j.elecom.2015.05.001 · doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2015.05.001
  81. Tsai, 2016, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 8, 10617, 10.1021/acsami.6b00831 · doi:10.1021/acsami.6b00831
  82. Wang, 2018, Adv. Energy Mater., 8
  83. Fu, 2017, Chem. Mater., 29, 8037, 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02339 · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02339
  84. Kotobuki, 2010, J. Electrochem. Soc., 157, A1076, 10.1149/1.3474232 · doi:10.1149/1.3474232
  85. Ohta, 2012, J. Power Sources, 202, 332, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.064 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.064
  86. van den Broek, 2016, Adv. Energy Mater., 6, 10.1002/aenm.201600736 · doi:10.1002/aenm.201600736
  87. Feng, 2017, Solid State Ionics, 310, 129, 10.1016/j.ssi.2017.08.016 · doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2017.08.016
  88. Yan, 2017, J. Phys. Chem. C, 121, 1431, 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10268 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10268
  89. Takami, 2017, J. Electrochem. Soc., 164, A6254, 10.1149/2.0421701jes · doi:10.1149/2.0421701jes
  90. Tao, 2017, Nano Lett., 17, 2967, 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00221 · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00221
  91. Huang, 2018, J. Power Sources, 382, 190, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.074 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.074
  92. Shimonishi, 2011, Solid State Ionics, 183, 48, 10.1016/j.ssi.2010.12.010 · doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2010.12.010
  93. Ishiguro, 2014, J. Electrochem. Soc., 161, A668, 10.1149/2.013405jes · doi:10.1149/2.013405jes

Cited by

See all 478

Metadata

Authors
Liu, Q., Geng, Z., Han, C., Fu, Y., Li, S., He, Y.-B., Kang, F., & Li, B.
Venue
Journal of Power Sources
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
389
Pages
120-134
ISSN
0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2797994582
Cited by
478
References
98
FWCI
21.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
  • Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (T23-407/13-N)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51232005, U1401243)
  • Shenzhen Technical Project (JCYJ20150529164918735, KQJSCX20160226191136, JCYJ20170412170911187)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2014CB932400)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016 M601018)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Challenges and perspectives of garnet solid electrolytes for all solid-state lithium batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.019
The paper
Liu, Q., Geng, Z., Han, C., Fu, Y., Li, S., He, Y.-B., Kang, F., & Li, B. (2018). Challenges and perspectives of garnet solid electrolytes for all solid-state lithium batteries. Journal of Power Sources. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.019

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.