Cited by 143Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvancements in Battery MaterialsControl Systems and Identification

State-of-charge sequence estimation of lithium-ion battery based on bidirectional long short-term memory encoder-decoder architecture

Bian, Chong, He, Huoliang, Yang, Shunkun, Huang, Tingting·2020·Journal of Power Sources

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227558

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 143

Authors
Bian, C., He, H., Yang, S., & Huang, T.
Affiliations
Beihang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yang, Shunkun
Venue
Journal of Power Sources
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
449
Pages
227558
ISSN
0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2992785100
Cited by
143
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 5
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Power Sources (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61672080, 41402020502)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
Keywords
state of charge estimation, lithium-ion batteries, bidirectional LSTM, encoder-decoder architecture, temperature variation, battery management systems, sequence estimation, long-range dependencies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review