Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Investigation of lithium-ion battery degradation mechanisms by combining differential voltage analysis and alternating current impedance

Zhu, Jiangong, Dewi Darma, Mariyam Susana, Knapp, Michael, Sørensen, Daniel R., Heere, Michael, Fang, Qiaohua, Wang, Xueyuan, Dai, Haifeng, Mereacre, Liuda, Senyshyn, Anatoliy, Wei, Xuezhe, Ehrenberg, Helmut·2020·Journal of Power Sources

Abstract

Abstract 18650-type cells with 2.5 Ah capacity are cycled at both 25 °C and 0 °C separately, and at 25 °C two charging protocols (constant current, and constant current-constant voltage charge) are used. Differential voltage analysis (dV/dQ) and alternating current (AC) impedance are mainly used to investigate battery degradation mechanisms quantitatively. The dV/dQ suggests that active cathode loss and loss of lithium inventory (LLI) are the dominating degradation factors. Significant microcracks are observed in the fatigued cathode particles from the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. Crystal structure parameters of selected fatigued batteries at fully charged state are determined by in situ high-resolution neutron powder diffraction. Obvious increases of ohmic resistance and solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) resistance occur when the battery capacity fade falls beneath 20%. Continuous charge transfer resistance and Warburg impedance coefficient (W.eff) increase are observed in the course of cycling. Correlation analysis is performed to bridge the gap between material loss as well as LLI and impedance increase. The increase of the charge transfer resistance is related to both active cathode loss and LLI, and a functional relationship is revealed between LLI and W.eff regardless of the used cycling protocols.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227575

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
Zhu, J., Dewi Darma, M. S., Knapp, M., Sørensen, D. R., Heere, M., Fang, Q., Wang, X., Dai, H., Mereacre, L., Senyshyn, A., Wei, X., & Ehrenberg, H.
Venue
Journal of Power Sources
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
448
Pages
227575
ISSN
0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995448028
Cited by
313
References
2
FWCI
11.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigation of lithium-ion battery degradation mechanisms by combining differential voltage analysis and alternating current impedance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227575
The paper
Zhu, J., Dewi Darma, M. S., Knapp, M., Sørensen, D. R., Heere, M., Fang, Q., Wang, X., Dai, H., Mereacre, L., Senyshyn, A., Wei, X., & Ehrenberg, H. (2020). Investigation of lithium-ion battery degradation mechanisms by combining differential voltage analysis and alternating current impedance. Journal of Power Sources. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227575

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.