The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigation of lithium-ion battery degradation mechanisms by combining differential voltage analysis and alternating current impedance
Abstract
Abstract 18650-type cells with 2.5 Ah capacity are cycled at both 25 °C and 0 °C separately, and at 25 °C two charging protocols (constant current, and constant current-constant voltage charge) are used. Differential voltage analysis (dV/dQ) and alternating current (AC) impedance are mainly used to investigate battery degradation mechanisms quantitatively. The dV/dQ suggests that active cathode loss and loss of lithium inventory (LLI) are the dominating degradation factors. Significant microcracks are observed in the fatigued cathode particles from the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. Crystal structure parameters of selected fatigued batteries at fully charged state are determined by in situ high-resolution neutron powder diffraction. Obvious increases of ohmic resistance and solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) resistance occur when the battery capacity fade falls beneath 20%. Continuous charge transfer resistance and Warburg impedance coefficient (W.eff) increase are observed in the course of cycling. Correlation analysis is performed to bridge the gap between material loss as well as LLI and impedance increase. The increase of the charge transfer resistance is related to both active cathode loss and LLI, and a functional relationship is revealed between LLI and W.eff regardless of the used cycling protocols.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Synthesize battery degradation modes via a diagnostic and prognostic model
Dubarry, M., Truchot, C., & Liaw, B. Y. (2012) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.016 · Cited by 1,065
Waag, W., Käbitz, S., & Sauer, D. U. (2013) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.09.030 · Cited by 987
Cited by
Wang, X., Wei, X., Zhu, J., Dai, H., Zheng, Y., Xu, X., & Chen, Q. (2021) · eTransportation · doi:10.1016/j.etran.2020.100093 · Cited by 451
Self-citationJiang, B., Zhu, J., Wang, X., Wei, X., Shang, W., & Dai, H. (2022) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119502 · Cited by 367
Self-citationWang, S., Takyi-Aninakwa, P., Jin, S., Yu, C., Fernandez, C., & Stroe, D.-I. (2022) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.124224 · Cited by 355
End-of-life or second-life options for retired electric vehicle batteries
Zhu, J., Mathews, I., Ren, D., Li, W., Cogswell, D., Xing, B., Sedlatschek, T., Kantareddy, S. N. R., Yi, M., Gao, T., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports Physical Science · doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100537 · Cited by 306
Self-citationLi, A. G., West, A. C., & Preindl, M. (2022) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119030 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, J., Dewi Darma, M. S., Knapp, M., Sørensen, D. R., Heere, M., Fang, Q., Wang, X., Dai, H., Mereacre, L., Senyshyn, A., Wei, X., & Ehrenberg, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Power Sources
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 448
- Pages
- 227575
- ISSN
- 0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2995448028
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigation of lithium-ion battery degradation mechanisms by combining differential voltage analysis and alternating current impedance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227575
- The paper
- Zhu, J., Dewi Darma, M. S., Knapp, M., Sørensen, D. R., Heere, M., Fang, Q., Wang, X., Dai, H., Mereacre, L., Senyshyn, A., Wei, X., & Ehrenberg, H. (2020). Investigation of lithium-ion battery degradation mechanisms by combining differential voltage analysis and alternating current impedance. Journal of Power Sources. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227575
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.