Cited by 32Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Metrological traceability in mass spectrometry-based targeted protein quantitation: A proof-of-principle study for serum apolipoproteins A-I and B100

Smit, Nico P.M., Romijn, Fred P.H.T.M., van den Broek, Irene, Drijfhout, Jan W., Haex, Martin, van der Laarse, Arnoud, van der Burgt, Yuri E.M., Cobbaert, Christa M.·2014·Journal of Proteomics

Abstract

In this study, we have followed up on previous liquid chromatography (LC) multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mass spectrometry (MS) approaches for measurement of apolipoprotein (apo) A-I and apo B100 in serum aiming for implementation of a multiplexed assay in a clinical chemistry laboratory with full metrological traceability. Signature peptides were selected and detected by dynamic MRM, and stable isotope labeled (SIL)-peptides were used as internal standards. Five apo A-I and four apo B100 peptides were measured in serum digests with linearity (R(2)>0.992) in the physiologically relevant concentration ranges. Linearity with regard to protein concentration was ascertained at five concentration levels (R(2)>0.926 and R(2)>0.965, for the apo A-I and apo B100 peptides, respectively). Three native value-assigned sera were used as external calibrators for further method verification. Imprecision values on sample preparation and LC-MS/MS acquisition were below the established minimal specifications for apo A-I and apo B100 (5.0% and 5.3%, respectively). Correlation of LC-MS/MS results with immunoturbidimetric assay results, for normo- and hypertriglyceridemic samples, showed R(2)>0.944 for apo A-I and R(2)>0.964 for apo B100. This LC-MS/MS method has potential for clinical application in normo- and dyslipidemic patients. Biological significance Measurement of apo A-I and apo B100 may offer an alternative to high and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c and LDL-c) methods fo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.06.015

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smit, N. P. M., Romijn, F. P. H. T. M., van den Broek, I., Drijfhout, J. W., Haex, M., van der Laarse, A., van der Burgt, Y. E. M., & Cobbaert, C. M.
Affiliations
Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Smit, Nico P.M.
Venue
Journal of Proteomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
109
Pages
143-161
ISSN
1874-3919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011267199
Cited by
32
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Proteomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
apolipoprotein A-I, apolipoprotein B-100, measurement traceability, isotope-labeled internal standards, signature peptides, external calibration, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disease risk assessment, multiplex assay
MeSH terms
Humans, Peptides, Mass Spectrometry, Apolipoprotein A-I, Dyslipidemias, Apolipoprotein B-100

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review