The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ibaqpy: A scalable Python package for baseline quantification in proteomics leveraging SDRF metadata
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Intensity-based absolute quantification (iBAQ) is essential in proteomics as it allows for the assessment of a protein's absolute abundance in various samples or conditions. However, the computation of these values for increasingly large-scale and high-throughput experiments, such as those using DIA, TMT, or LFQ workflows, poses significant challenges in scalability and reproducibility. Here, we present ibaqpy (https://github.com/bigbio/ibaqpy), a Python package designed to compute iBAQ values efficiently for experiments of any scale. Ibaqpy leverages the Sample and Data Relationship Format (SDRF) metadata standard to incorporate experimental metadata into the quantification workflow. This allows for automatic normalization and batch correction while accounting for key aspects of the experimental design, such as technical and biological replicates, fractionation strategies, and sample conditions. Designed for large-scale proteomics datasets, ibaqpy can also recompute iBAQ values for existing experiments when an SDRF is available. We showcased ibaqpy's capabilities by reanalyzing 17 public proteomics datasets from ProteomeXchange, covering HeLa cell lines with 4921 samples and 5766 MS runs, quantifying a total of 11,014 proteins. In our reanalysis, ibaqpy is a key component in automating reproducible quantification, reducing manual effort and making quantitative proteomics more accessible while supporting FAIR principles for data reuse. SIGNIFICANCE: Proteomics studies often rely on intensity-based absolute quantification (iBAQ) to assess protein abundance across various biological conditions. Despite its widespread use, computing iBAQ values at scale remains challenging due to the increasing complexity and volume of proteomics experiments. Existing tools frequently lack metadata integration, limiting their ability to handle experimental design intricacies such as replicates, fractions, and batch effects. Our work introduces ibaqpy, a scalable Python package that leverages the Sample and Data Relationship Format (SDRF) to compute iBAQ values efficiently while incorporating critical experimental metadata. By enabling automated normalization and batch correction, ibaqpy ensures reproducible and comparable quantification across large-scale datasets. We validated the utility of ibaqpy through the reanalysis of 17 public HeLa datasets, comprising over 200 million peptide features and quantifying 11,000 proteins across thousands of samples. This comprehensive reanalysis highlights the robustness and scalability of ibaqpy, making it an essential tool for researchers conducting large-scale proteomics experiments. Moreover, by promoting FAIR principles for data reuse and interoperability, ibaqpy offers a transformative approach to baseline protein quantification, supporting reproducible research and data integration within the proteomics community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566
A “Proteomic Ruler” for Protein Copy Number and Concentration Estimation without Spike-in Standards
Wiśniewski, J. R., Hein, M. Y., Cox, J., & Mann, M. (2014) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m113.037309 · Cited by 690
Analysis of High Accuracy, Quantitative Proteomics Data in the MaxQB Database
Schaab, C., Geiger, T., Stoehr, G., Cox, J., & Mann, M. (2012) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m111.014068 · Cited by 164
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- Petryszak, 2014, Expression Atlas update--a database of gene and transcript expression from microarray- and sequencing-based functional genomics experiments, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D926, 10.1093/nar/gkt1270 · DOI
- Dai, 2024, Quantms: a cloud-based pipeline for quantitative proteomics enables the reanalysis of public proteomics data, Nat. Methods, 21, 1603, 10.1038/s41592-024-02343-1 · DOI
- Jarnuczak, 2021, An integrated landscape of protein expression in human cancer, Sci. Data, 8, 115, 10.1038/s41597-021-00890-2 · DOI
- McDonagh, 2024, Human genetics and genomics for drug target identification and prioritization: open targets’ perspective, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci, 7, 59, 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-102523-103838 · DOI
- Huang, 2023, PaxDb 5.0: curated protein quantification data suggests adaptive proteome changes in yeasts, Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 22, 10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640 · DOI
- Lautenbacher, 2022, ProteomicsDB: toward a FAIR open-source resource for life-science research, Nucleic Acids Res., 50, D1541, 10.1093/nar/gkab1026 · DOI
- Dai, 2024, Quantms: a cloud-based pipeline for quantitative proteomics enables the reanalysis of public proteomics data, Nat. Methods, 21, 1603, 10.1038/s41592-024-02343-1 · DOI
- Wang, 2023, Tissue-based absolute quantification using large-scale TMT and LFQ experiments, Proteomics, 23, 10.1002/pmic.202300188 · DOI
- Wang, 2023, Pan-cancer proteomics analysis to identify tumor-enriched and highly expressed cell surface antigens as potential targets for cancer therapeutics, Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 22, 10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100626 · DOI
- Wang, 2024, Evaluating computational approaches for comparison of protein expression across cancer indications, bioRxiv
- Cox, 2008, MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification, Nat. Biotechnol., 26, 1367, 10.1038/nbt.1511 · DOI · Paper page
- Sinitcyn, 2021, MaxDIA enables library-based and library-free data-independent acquisition proteomics, Nat. Biotechnol., 39, 1563, 10.1038/s41587-021-00968-7 · DOI
- Kong, 2017, MSFragger: ultrafast and comprehensive peptide identification in mass spectrometry-based proteomics, Nat. Methods, 14, 513, 10.1038/nmeth.4256 · DOI
- Demichev, 2020, DIA-NN: neural networks and interference correction enable deep proteome coverage in high throughput, Nat. Methods, 17, 41, 10.1038/s41592-019-0638-x · DOI
- Cox, 2014, Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ, Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 13, 2513, 10.1074/mcp.M113.031591 · DOI · Paper page
- Shi, 2024, LFQRatio: a normalization method to decipher quantitative proteome changes in microbial Coculture systems, J. Proteome Res., 23, 999, 10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00714 · DOI
- Rosenberger, 2014, aLFQ: an R-package for estimating absolute protein quantities from label-free LC-MS/MS proteomics data, Bioinformatics, 30, 2511, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu200 · DOI
- Pfeuffer, 2024, OpenMS 3 enables reproducible analysis of large-scale mass spectrometry data, Nat. Methods, 21, 365, 10.1038/s41592-024-02197-7 · DOI
- Rost, 2014, OpenSWATH enables automated, targeted analysis of data-independent acquisition MS data, Nat. Biotechnol., 32, 219, 10.1038/nbt.2841 · DOI
- Pino, 2020, The skyline ecosystem: informatics for quantitative mass spectrometry proteomics, Mass Spectrom. Rev., 39, 229, 10.1002/mas.21540 · DOI
- Dai, 2021, A proteomics sample metadata representation for multiomics integration and big data analysis, Nat. Commun., 12, 5854, 10.1038/s41467-021-26111-3 · DOI
- Deutsch, 2023, The ProteomeXchange consortium at 10 years: 2023 update, Nucleic Acids Res., 51, D1539, 10.1093/nar/gkac1040 · DOI
- Perez-Riverol, 2025, The PRIDE database at 20 years: 2025 update, Nucleic Acids Res., 53, D543, 10.1093/nar/gkae1011 · DOI
- Webel, 2024, Mass spectrometry-based proteomics data from thousands of HeLa control samples, Sci. Data, 11, 112, 10.1038/s41597-024-02922-z · DOI
- Behdenna, 2023, pyComBat, a Python tool for batch effects correction in high-throughput molecular data using empirical Bayes methods, BMC Bioinform., 24, 459, 10.1186/s12859-023-05578-5 · DOI
- Colange, 2024, Differential expression analysis with inmoose, the integrated multi-omic open-source environment in python, bioRxiv
- Leek, 2010, Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data, Nat. Rev. Genet., 11, 733, 10.1038/nrg2825 · DOI · Paper page
- Metatla, 2024, Neat plasma proteomics: getting the best out of the worst, Clin. Proteomics, 21, 22, 10.1186/s12014-024-09477-6 · DOI
- Geyer, 2019, Plasma proteome profiling to detect and avoid sample-related biases in biomarker studies, EMBO Mol. Med., 11, 10.15252/emmm.201910427 · DOI · Paper page
- Krey, 2014, Accurate label-free protein quantitation with high- and low-resolution mass spectrometers, J. Proteome Res., 13, 1034, 10.1021/pr401017h · DOI
- Wisniewski, 2015, Absolute protein quantification allows differentiation of cell-specific metabolic routes and functions, Proteomics, 15, 1316, 10.1002/pmic.201400456 · DOI
- Bairoch, 2018, The Cellosaurus, a cell-line knowledge resource, J. Biomol. Tech., 29, 25, 10.7171/jbt.18-2902-002 · DOI · Paper page
- Petralia, 2020, Integrated proteogenomic characterization across major histological types of pediatric brain cancer, Cell, 183, 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.044 · DOI · Paper page
- Pelletier, 2024, BERNN: enhancing classification of liquid chromatography mass spectrometry data with batch effect removal neural networks, Nat. Commun., 15, 3777, 10.1038/s41467-024-48177-5 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Zheng, P., Audain, E., Webel, H., Dai, C., Klein, J., Hitz, M.-P., Sachsenberg, T., Bai, M., & Perez-Riverol, Y.
- Affiliations
- Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
- Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
- Novo Nordisk Foundation (DK)
- Beijing Proteome Research Center (CN)
- Boston University (US)
- University of Tübingen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Bai, Mingze
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Proteomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-06
- Volume
- 317
- Pages
- 105440
- ISSN
- 1874-3919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4409644639
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3
- Type
- software paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Proteomics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/X001911/1)
- Wellcome Trust (208391/Z/17/Z, 223745/Z/21/Z)
- Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Keywords
- quantitative proteomics, protein abundance quantification, batch effect correction, normalization, sample fractionation, data reanalysis, FAIR principles, reproducibility, Python, HeLa cells, interoperability, data interoperability
- MeSH terms
- Metadata, HeLa Cells, Humans, Software, Proteome, Databases, Protein, Proteomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review