Cited by 164Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory and Neural MechanismsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

A randomized controlled trial of the effect of D-cycloserine on exposure therapy for spider fear

Guastella, Adam J., Dadds, Mark R., Lovibond, Peter F., Mitchell, Philip, Richardson, Rick·2007·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Previous research [Hofmann SG, Meuret AE, Smits JA, Simon NM, Pollack MH, Eisenmenger K, et al. Augmentation of exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder with D-cycloserine. Archives of General Psychiatry 2006;63:298-304; Ressler KJ, Rothbaum BO, Tannenbaum L, Anderson P, Graap K, Zimand E, et al. Cognitive enhancers as adjuncts to psychotherapy: use of d-cycloserine in phobic individuals to facilitate extinction of fear. Archives of General Psychiatry 2004;61:1136-44] suggests that d-cycloserine (DCS) facilitates the reduction of clinical fear in humans. We used a well established intervention to evaluate the effectiveness of administering DCS as an adjunct to exposure therapy in a heightened, but sub-clinical, fear population. Over two studies, 100 spider-fearful participants were allocated to DCS or placebo before treatment and were assessed at pre-, immediate post-, and 3.5 weeks post-treatment. Significant treatment effects and return of fear was observed at follow-up, particularly in non-treatment contexts; however, both studies failed to demonstrate any enhancing effects of DCS (50 or 500 mg). DCS did not enhance the reduction of spider fears or the generalisation of treatment of a single session of exposure-based therapy. These results suggest that DCS may not enhance loss of non-clinical levels of fear in human populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.05.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 164

Authors
Guastella, A. J., Dadds, M. R., Lovibond, P. F., Mitchell, P., & Richardson, R.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Guastella, Adam J.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
466-471
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026678817
Cited by
164
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
20.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
D-cycloserine, spider phobia, exposure therapy, nootropic drugs, fear extinction, return of fear, adjunctive pharmacotherapy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Animals, Combined Modality Therapy, Cycloserine, Drug Administration Schedule, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phobic Disorders, Photic Stimulation, Spiders, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, N-Methylaspartate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review