Cited by 209Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Reduced lateral prefrontal activation in adult patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ADHD) during a working memory task: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study

Ehlis, Ann-Christine, Bähne, Christina G., Jacob, Christian P., Herrmann, Martin J., Fallgatter, Andreas J.·2008·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is an optical imaging method, which allows non-invasive in vivo measurements of changes in the concentration of oxygenated (O2Hb) and deoxygenated (HHb) haemoglobin in cortical tissue. For the present study, we examined 13 adult ADHD patients and 13 age- and gender-matched healthy controls by means of multi-channel NIRS (Optical Topography; ETG-100, Hitachi Medical Co., Japan) during performance of a working memory (n-back) paradigm. Compared to the healthy control group, ADHD patients showed reduced task-related increases in the concentration of O2Hb in NIRS channels located over the ventro-lateral prefrontal cortex, indicating reduced activation during performance of the n-back task in this part of the brain. This finding was particularly apparent for the task condition with high working memory load (2-back), and was accompanied by a statistical trend towards an increased number of omission errors in the patient group. The data confirm previous findings of working memory deficits and prefrontal cortex dysfunction in patients suffering from ADHD, and are discussed in the light of imaging findings and theoretical models of working memory function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2007.11.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 209

Authors
Ehlis, A.-C., Bähne, C. G., Jacob, C. P., Herrmann, M. J., & Fallgatter, A. J.
Affiliations
University of Würzburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Ehlis, Ann-Christine
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-10
Volume
42
Issue
13
Pages
1060-1067
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161617509
Cited by
209
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, adult ADHD, working memory, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, prefrontal cortex dysfunction, n-back task, oxygenated haemoglobin, functional near-infrared spectroscopy, working memory load, omission errors
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain Mapping, Female, Hemoglobins, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxyhemoglobins, Prefrontal Cortex, Statistics, Nonparametric, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review