Reduced lateral prefrontal activation in adult patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ADHD) during a working memory task: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study
Abstract
Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is an optical imaging method, which allows non-invasive in vivo measurements of changes in the concentration of oxygenated (O2Hb) and deoxygenated (HHb) haemoglobin in cortical tissue. For the present study, we examined 13 adult ADHD patients and 13 age- and gender-matched healthy controls by means of multi-channel NIRS (Optical Topography; ETG-100, Hitachi Medical Co., Japan) during performance of a working memory (n-back) paradigm. Compared to the healthy control group, ADHD patients showed reduced task-related increases in the concentration of O2Hb in NIRS channels located over the ventro-lateral prefrontal cortex, indicating reduced activation during performance of the n-back task in this part of the brain. This finding was particularly apparent for the task condition with high working memory load (2-back), and was accompanied by a statistical trend towards an increased number of omission errors in the patient group. The data confirm previous findings of working memory deficits and prefrontal cortex dysfunction in patients suffering from ADHD, and are discussed in the light of imaging findings and theoretical models of working memory function.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The MFG plays an executive role in the visuospatial working memory network and a primary role in volitional (top-down) allocation of attention.
“The MFG is believed to play an executive role in the visuospatial working memory network, and a primary role in volitional (top-down) allocation of attention (Burgess et al., 2010; Ehlis et al., 2008; Vance et al., 2007).”
From Functional neuroimaging of visuospatial working memory tasks enables accurate detection of attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (2015) · cites this paper as Ehlis et al., 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 209
- Authors
- Ehlis, A.-C., Bähne, C. G., Jacob, C. P., Herrmann, M. J., & Fallgatter, A. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Würzburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Ehlis, Ann-Christine
- Venue
- Journal of Psychiatric Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1060-1067
- ISSN
- 0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161617509
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 7.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Keywords
- attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, adult ADHD, working memory, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, prefrontal cortex dysfunction, n-back task, oxygenated haemoglobin, functional near-infrared spectroscopy, working memory load, omission errors
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain Mapping, Female, Hemoglobins, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxyhemoglobins, Prefrontal Cortex, Statistics, Nonparametric, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review