Diffusion abnormalities in adolescents and young adults with a history of heavy cannabis use
Open accessAbstract
Background There is growing evidence that adolescence is a key period for neuronal maturation. Despite the high prevalence of marijuana use among adolescents and young adults in the United States and internationally, very little is known about its impact on the developing brain. Based on neuroimaging literature on normal brain developmental during adolescence, we hypothesized that individuals with heavy cannabis use (HCU) would have brain structure abnormalities in similar brain regions that undergo development during late adolescence, particularly the fronto-temporal connection.Method Fourteen young adult males in residential treatment for cannabis dependence and 14 age-matched healthy male control subjects were recruited. Patients had a history of HCU throughout adolescence; 5 had concurrent alcohol abuse. Subjects underwent structural and diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. White matter integrity was compared between subject groups using voxelwise and fiber tractography analysis.Results Voxelwise and tractography analyses revealed that adolescents with HCU had reduced fractional anisotropy, increased radial diffusivity, and increased trace in the homologous areas known to be involved in ongoing development during late adolescence, particularly in the fronto-temporal connection via arcuate fasciculus.Conclusions Our results support the hypothesis that heavy cannabis use during adolescence may affect the trajectory of normal brain maturation. Due to concurrent alcohol consumption in five HCU subjects, conclusions from this study should be considered preliminary, as the DTI findings reported here may be reflective of the combination of alcohol and marijuana use. Further research in larger samples, longitudinal in nature, and controlling for alcohol consumption is needed to better understand the pathophysiology of the effect of cannabis on the developing brain.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RD differences between cannabis users and controls are mixed, with studies reporting higher, lower, or nonsignificant differences.
“The relationship between RD and cannabis use is similarly mixed, with studies finding higher (Ashtari et al., 2009; Becker, Collins, Lim, Muetzel, & Luciana, 2015; Jakabek et al., 2016), lower (Filbey et al., 2014; Jakabek et al., 2016), or nonsignificant (Shollenbarger et al., 2015) differences in cannabis users relative to controls.”
From Substance abuse and white matter: Findings, limitations, and future of diffusion tensor imaging research (2019) · cites this paper as Ashtari et al., 2009
Heavy cannabis users have lower FA.
“heavy users of cannabis exhibited lower FA (Ashtari, Cervellione, Cottone, Ardekani, & Kumra, 2009).”
From Substance abuse and white matter: Findings, limitations, and future of diffusion tensor imaging research (2019) · cites this paper as Ashtari, Cervellione, Cottone, Ardekani, & Kumra, 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 79 · Cited by 159
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Kaplan W 2003 Advanced calculus 5 Boston, MA Addison Wesley
- Kent JT Bibby JM Marida KV 1980 Multivariate analysis: Probability and mathematical statistics San Diego, CA Academic Press
- Authors
- Ashtari, M., Cervellione, K., Cottone, J., Ardekani, B. A., & Kumra, S.
- Affiliations
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
- Jamaica Hospital (US)
- Zucker Hillside Hospital (US)
- Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ashtari, Manzar
- Venue
- Journal of Psychiatric Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 189-204
- ISSN
- 0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3314332
- OpenAlex
- W2098983416
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 8.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH073150, 7K23MH64556-06, MH-070612, K23MH064556, R03MH070612)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (K23DA015541)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- heavy cannabis use, adolescent cannabis use, brain development, white matter integrity, diffusion tensor imaging, fractional anisotropy, radial diffusivity, arcuate fasciculus, cannabis use disorder, alcohol abuse, structural brain abnormalities
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Alcoholism, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Marijuana Abuse, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Nerve Net, Temporal Lobe, Case-Control Studies, Anisotropy, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review