Cited by 172Schizophrenia research and treatmentNerve injury and regenerationTreatment of Major Depression

Expression of hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor and its receptors in Stanley consortium brains

Open access
Dunham, J.S., Deakin, J.F.W., Miyajima, F., Payton, A., Toro, C.T.·2009·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Several lines of evidence implicate BDNF in the pathophysiology of psychiatric illness. BDNF polymorphisms have also been associated with the risk of schizophrenia and mood disorders. We therefore investigated whether levels of (pro)BDNF and receptor proteins, TrkB and p75, are altered in hippocampus in schizophrenia and mood disorder and whether polymorphisms in each gene influenced protein expression. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded hippocampal sections from subjects with schizophrenia, major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder (BPD) and non-psychiatric controls were obtained from the Stanley Foundation Neuropathology Consortium. (pro)BDNF, TrkB(T1) and p75 protein densities were quantified by immunoautoradiography and DNA extracted from each subject was used to determine the effect of genotype on protein expression. In MDD, reductions in (pro)BDNF were seen in all layers of the right but not the left hippocampus with no changes in the dentate gyrus. The pattern was similar but less marked for BPD. In addition, BPD but not MDD patients, had bilateral reductions in p75 in hippocampal layers but not in dentate gyrus. No changes in TrkB(T1) density were seen in any diagnosis. These findings suggest MDD and BPD may share impairment in (pro)BDNF expression. However, BPD may involve impairments of both (pro)BDNF and p75 receptor, whereas MDD may involve impaired (pro)BDNF alone. Moreover, the lateralisation of changes may indicate a role of asymmetry in vulnerability to MDD. Hippocampal (pro)BDNF and receptor levels were also affected by genotype, suggesting that allelic variations are important in the hippocampal abnormalities seen in these psychiatric disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.03.008

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BDNF expression is increased in post-mortem brains of depressed patients treated with antidepressant drugs compared to non-treated patients.

    “Interestingly, it has been shown that BDNF expression was increased in post-mortem brains of depressed patients treated with antidepressant drugs as compared to non-treated patients (Chen et al. 2001; Dunham et al. 2009).”

    From Neurotrophic factors and neuroplasticity pathways in the pathophysiology and treatment of depression (2018) · cites this paper as Dunham et al. 2009

    The Drug Treatment section acknowledges antidepressant-associated BDNF increases reported in earlier studies, but says this study could not confirm them. The Additional information section reports no significant difference between treated and untreated patients and no trend toward an increase among treated patients with MDD. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 172

Authors
Dunham, J. S., Deakin, J. F. W., Miyajima, F., Payton, A., & Toro, C. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Cranfield University (GB)
Corresponding author
Toro, C.T.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
43
Issue
14
Pages
1175-1184
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135668275
Cited by
172
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
FWCI
7.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CERES (Cranfield University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
brain-derived neurotrophic factor, proBDNF, TrkB receptor, p75 neurotrophin receptor, hippocampus, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, BDNF polymorphism, genotype-phenotype correlation, laterality, dentate gyrus, neuropathology
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Bipolar Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Genotype, Hippocampus, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Middle Aged, Postmortem Changes, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Case-Control Studies, Radioimmunotherapy, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Receptor, Nerve Growth Factor, Receptor, trkB

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review