Cited by 56Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Working memory deficits affect risky decision-making in methamphetamine users with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Open access
Duarte, Nichole A., Woods, Steven Paul, Rooney, Alexandra, Atkinson, J. Hampton, Grant, Igor·2012·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Methamphetamine (MA) use and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) commonly co-occur and are independently associated with dysregulation of frontostriatal loops and risky decision-making; however, whether their comorbidity exacerbates risky decision-making is not known. This study evaluated 23 participants with histories of MA dependence and ADHD (MA+ADHD+), 25 subjects with MA dependence alone (MA+ADHD-), and 22 healthy adults (MA-ADHD-), who completed the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) as part of a larger neuropsychiatric research evaluation. Results showed a significant interaction between ADHD, MA, and working memory, such that individuals with working memory deficits in the MA+ADHD+ cohort demonstrated the strongest propensity to select cards from "disadvantageous" versus "advantageous" decks on the IGT. This effect was not better explained by other psychiatric, substance use, neuromedical, or cognitive factors. Findings suggest that working memory deficits may moderate the expression of risky decision-making in MA users with ADHD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.01.006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two other studies reported no greater levels of risky performance in adults with ADHD on the standard IGT compared to NCs, and one other study only revealed aberrant performance on the standard IGT in a subgroup of adults with ADHD with both hard drug dependence and working memory problems.

    “Much like Agay et al. [59], two other studies have also reported no greater levels of risky performance in adults with ADHD on the standard IGT when compared to NCs [61], [64], and one other study only revealed aberrant performance on the standard IGT in a subgroup of adults with ADHD with both hard drug dependence and working memory problems [60].”
  • Null findings were reported in 4/15 (27%) of studies with null findings in which participants were MPH-naïve.

    “MPH-naïve patients: 4/15 = 27% of studies with null findings [54], [60], [66], [68]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 56

Authors
Duarte, N. A., Woods, S. P., Rooney, A., Atkinson, J. H., & Grant, I.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Woods, Steven Paul
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
492-499
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133280615
Cited by
56
References
62
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P30MH062512)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P50DA026306, P01DA012065)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
methamphetamine dependence, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, working memory deficits, risky decision making, Iowa Gambling Task, frontostriatal circuits, substance use disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Decision Making, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk-Taking, Amphetamine-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review