Cited by 69Schizophrenia research and treatmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Systematic meta-analysis of childhood social withdrawal in schizophrenia, and comparison with data from at-risk children aged 9–14 years

Matheson, Sandra L., Vijayan, Hena, Dickson, Hannah, Shepherd, Alana M., Carr, Vaughan J., Laurens, Kristin R.·2013·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Social withdrawal is a robust childhood risk factor for later schizophrenia. The aims of this paper were to assess the evidence for childhood social withdrawal among adults with schizophrenia and, comparatively, in children aged 9-14 years who are putatively at-risk of developing schizophrenia. We conducted a meta-analysis, including cohort and case-control studies reporting social withdrawal measured by the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) in adults with schizophrenia vs. controls. Further, an experimental study compared CBCL withdrawal scores from typically-developing children with scores from two groups of putatively at-risk children: (i) children displaying a triad of replicated antecedents for schizophrenia, and (ii) children with at least one first- or second-degree relative with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Six studies met inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis (N = 3828), which demonstrated a large effect of increased childhood social withdrawal in adults with schizophrenia (standardized mean difference [SMD] score = 1.035, 95% CI = 0.304-1.766, p = 0.006), with no indication of publication bias, but considerable heterogeneity (I(2) = 91%). Results from the experimental study also indicated a large effect of increased social withdrawal in children displaying the antecedent triad (SMD = 0.743, p = 0.001), and a weaker effect in children with a family history of schizophrenia (SMD = 0.442, p = 0.051). Childhood social withdrawal may constitute a vulnerabi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.03.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 69

Authors
Matheson, S. L., Vijayan, H., Dickson, H., Shepherd, A. M., Carr, V. J., & Laurens, K. R.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Matheson, Sandra L.
  • Laurens, Kristin R.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
47
Issue
8
Pages
1061-1068
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111050390
Cited by
69
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • UWL Repository (University of West London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (CDF/01/015)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
schizophrenia, vulnerable children, family history of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, Child Behavior Checklist, vulnerability indicators, genetic risk factors, childhood risk factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Developmental Disabilities, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia, Social Behavior Disorders, Psychological Distance, Databases, Bibliographic, Caregivers, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review