Systematic meta-analysis of childhood social withdrawal in schizophrenia, and comparison with data from at-risk children aged 9–14 years
Abstract
Social withdrawal is a robust childhood risk factor for later schizophrenia. The aims of this paper were to assess the evidence for childhood social withdrawal among adults with schizophrenia and, comparatively, in children aged 9-14 years who are putatively at-risk of developing schizophrenia. We conducted a meta-analysis, including cohort and case-control studies reporting social withdrawal measured by the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) in adults with schizophrenia vs. controls. Further, an experimental study compared CBCL withdrawal scores from typically-developing children with scores from two groups of putatively at-risk children: (i) children displaying a triad of replicated antecedents for schizophrenia, and (ii) children with at least one first- or second-degree relative with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Six studies met inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis (N = 3828), which demonstrated a large effect of increased childhood social withdrawal in adults with schizophrenia (standardized mean difference [SMD] score = 1.035, 95% CI = 0.304-1.766, p = 0.006), with no indication of publication bias, but considerable heterogeneity (I(2) = 91%). Results from the experimental study also indicated a large effect of increased social withdrawal in children displaying the antecedent triad (SMD = 0.743, p = 0.001), and a weaker effect in children with a family history of schizophrenia (SMD = 0.442, p = 0.051). Childhood social withdrawal may constitute a vulnerabi…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The CBCL is widely used in pediatric psychiatry.
“The CBCL was developed by Achenbach et al. for the comprehensive assessment of children’s emotional and behavioral problems [61] and is widely used in pediatric psychiatry [62–65].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- Matheson, S. L., Vijayan, H., Dickson, H., Shepherd, A. M., Carr, V. J., & Laurens, K. R.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Matheson, Sandra L.
- Laurens, Kristin R.
- Venue
- Journal of Psychiatric Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1061-1068
- ISSN
- 0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111050390
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- UWL Repository (University of West London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (CDF/01/015)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, vulnerable children, family history of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, Child Behavior Checklist, vulnerability indicators, genetic risk factors, childhood risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Developmental Disabilities, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia, Social Behavior Disorders, Psychological Distance, Databases, Bibliographic, Caregivers, Checklist
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review