Cited by 293Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Disrupted amygdala-prefrontal functional connectivity in civilian women with posttraumatic stress disorder

Open access
Stevens, Jennifer S., Jovanovic, Tanja, Fani, Negar, Ely, Timothy D., Glover, Ebony M., Bradley, Bekh, Ressler, Kerry J.·2013·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Many features of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can be linked to exaggerated and dysregulated emotional responses. Central to the neurocircuitry regulating emotion are functional interactions between the amygdala and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Findings from human and animal studies suggest that disruption of this circuit predicts individual differences in emotion regulation. However, only a few studies have examined amygdala-vmPFC connectivity in the context of emotional processing in PTSD. The aim of the present research was to investigate the hypothesis that PTSD is associated with disrupted functional connectivity of the amygdala and vmPFC in response to emotional stimuli, extending previous findings by demonstrating such links in an understudied, highly traumatized, civilian population. 40 African-American women with civilian trauma (20 with PTSD and 20 non-PTSD controls) were recruited from a large urban hospital. Participants viewed fearful and neutral face stimuli during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Relative to controls, participants with PTSD showed an increased right amygdala response to fearful stimuli (p(corr) < .05). Right amygdala activation correlated positively with the severity of hyperarousal symptoms in the PTSD group. Participants with PTSD showed decreased functional connectivity between the right amygdala and left vmPFC (p(corr) < .05). The findings are consistent with previous findings showing PTSD is associated with an exaggerated response of amygdala-mediated emotional arousal systems. This is the first study to show that the amygdala response may be accompanied by disruption of an amygdala-vmPFC functional circuit that is hypothesized to be involved in prefrontal cortical regulation of amygdala responsivity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.05.031

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Functional connectivity findings in adult PTSD are mixed, suggesting both greater and lower amygdala-mPFC connectivity to negative stimuli.

    “Functional connectivity findings in adult PTSD have been mixed, suggesting both greater [11–13] and lower [14] amygdala-mPFC connectivity to negative stimuli.”

    From Trauma, PTSD, and the Developing Brain (2017) · cites this paper as [14]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 293

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Spielberger CD Gorsuch RL Lushene RE 1970 The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: Test manual Palo Alto, CA Consulting Psychologist Press

Authors
Stevens, J. S., Jovanovic, T., Fani, N., Ely, T. D., Glover, E. M., Bradley, B., & Ressler, K. J.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Stevens, Jennifer S.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
47
Issue
10
Pages
1469-1478
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103881507
Cited by
293
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 2
FWCI
27.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000454)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 071537, R21MH098212, MH098212, R01MH096764, R01MH071537, R56MH071537)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000039)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, amygdala, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, emotional processing, hyperarousal, African American women, civilian trauma, fear response, emotion regulation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Amygdala, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Neural Pathways, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Statistics as Topic, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review