The effect of exercise on resting concentrations of peripheral brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Exercise interventions have been shown to successfully improve depression in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), but like other forms of antidepressant treatment, exercise is not effective in all patients and its mechanisms of action have not been fully elucidated. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a key mediator of neurogenesis and neuronal survival, has been shown to be decreased in individuals with MDD. One potential mechanism by which exercise alleviates depression is through an increase in BDNF. In order to evaluate this hypothesis, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies that assessed the effects of a chronic (multi-week) exercise intervention on BDNF concentrations in MDD patients. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine Source, and CINAHL databases were searched for original, peer-reviewed reports of peripheral blood BDNF concentrations before and after a chronic exercise intervention in MDD patients. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were generated from random effects models. Potential sources of heterogeneity were explored in meta-regression analyses. In six studies that met inclusion criteria, resting blood concentrations of BDNF were not significantly higher after a chronic exercise intervention (SMD = 0.43, 95% CI: -0.06-0.92, p = 0.09) in MDD patients. This meta-analysis did not find evidence that a chronic aerobic exercise intervention increases resting concentrations of BDNF in the blood of MDD patients; however, there is a lack of studies in this area making it difficult to reach a definitive conclusion. Future studies on this topic with larger sample sizes and longer durations are needed to draw more robust conclusions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Longer-term changes in BDNF fell short of significance (SMD = 0.43, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.92, p = 0.09) in a preliminary meta-analysis of 6 RCTs and 176 participants.
“However, a preliminary meta-analysis [86] of only 6 RCTs and 176 participants found that longer-term changes in BDNF fell short of significance (SMD = 0.43, 95% CI -0.06-0.92,p = 0.09).”
From Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes (2020) · cites this paper as [86]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 80 · Cited by 50
- Authors
- Dinoff, A., Herrmann, N., Swardfager, W., Gallagher, D., & Lanctôt, K. L.
- Affiliations
- Sunnybrook Research Institute (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Herrmann, Nathan
- Venue
- Journal of Psychiatric Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 105
- Pages
- 123-131
- ISSN
- 0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2890069787
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
- Keywords
- physical activity, major depressive disorder, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, aerobic exercise, depression mechanisms, neurogenesis, antidepressant mechanism
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Exercise, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review