Cited by 20Genetic Associations and EpidemiologySmoking Behavior and CessationMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Maternal smoking during pregnancy and risks to depression and anxiety in offspring: An observational study and genome-wide gene-environment interaction analysis in UK biobank cohort

Chu, Xiaomeng, Ye, Jing, Wen, Yan, Li, Ping, Cheng, Bolun, Cheng, Shiqiang, Zhang, Lu, Liu, Li +9 more·2021·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Background Maternal smoking during pregnancy (MSDP) has been reported to be associated with increased anxiety and depression behaviors in offspring. However, there is still scant evidence to support the link between MSDP and anxiety/depression. Methods Using the subjects from the UK Biobank cohort (n = 371,903-432,881). Logistic regression analyses were first conducted to test the correlation between MSDP and anxiety/depression in offspring. Second, genome-wide gene-environment interaction study (GWGEIS) analyses were conducted by PLINK, using MSDP as environmental factor. Genetic correlation analysis of anxiety/depression and smoking was conducted by the LDSC software using the published genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary data of four smoking traits (n = 337,334-1,232,091), anxiety (n = 31,880) and depression (n = 490,359). Finally, pathway enrichment analysis was carried out to detect the pathway involved in the development of offspring anxiety caused by the interaction of MSDP × SNPs. Results Observational analyses showed that anxiety and depression status in offspring were significantly associated with MSDP (all p < 0.0001). Further GWEGI analyses observed significant MSDP-gene interaction effects at UNC80 gene for anxiety (p = 9.09 × 10-9). LDSC did not detect significant genetic correlation between anxiety and smoking traits. Pathway analysis identified 19 significant pathways for anxiety, such as MANALO_HYPOXIA_UP (FDR = 5.50 × 10-4), REACTOME_ADHERENS_JUNCTIONS_INTERACTIONS (FDR = 0.0304) and ONDER_CDH1_TARGETS_2_UP (FDR = 0.0371). Conclusion Our study results suggested the important impact of MDSP on the risk of anxiety in offspring, partly attributing to environment-gene interactions effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.05.067

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Environment-gene interaction analysis found a genome-wide significant SNP and several SNPs located in the UNC80 gene, which produces a protein component of the sodium-ion channel complex (NALCN).

    “Environment-gene interaction analysis also found a genome-wide significant SNP and several SNPs located in the UNC80 gene, a gene that produces a protein component of the sodium-ion channel complex (NALCN).”
  • Previous studies suggest that NALCN might be involved in the pathway between GABA receptors and anxiety and have been associated with neurodevelopmental changes associated with several anxiety-related risk factors.

    “Although there is no direct relationship between NALCN and anxiety, previous studies suggest that NALCN might be involved in the pathway between GABA receptors and anxiety and have been associated with neurodevelopmental changes that are associated with several anxiety-related risk factors [131–133].”
  • In an observational and genome-wide gene-environment interaction study using UK Biobank subjects, PNE was significantly associated with anxiety and depression in offspring (p < 0.0001) compared with non-exposed controls.

    “Their analysis showed that PNE was significantly associated with anxiety and depression in offspring (p < 0.0001) as compared with non-exposed controls.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chu, X., Ye, J., Wen, Y., Li, P., Cheng, B., Cheng, S., Zhang, L., Liu, L., Qi, X., Ma, M., Liang, C., Kafle, O. P., Wu, C., Wang, S., Wang, X., Ning, Y., & Zhang, F.
Affiliations
National Health and Family Planning Commission (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Feng
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
140
Pages
149-158
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3172544823
Cited by
20
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81673112, 81972980, 81922059, 2016YFE0119100)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  • Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province (2017JZ024)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
smoking during pregnancy, offspring depression, gene-environment interaction, pathway enrichment, prenatal tobacco exposure, UK Biobank
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Carrier Proteins, Depression, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Membrane Proteins, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Smoking, Biological Specimen Banks, Genome-Wide Association Study, Gene-Environment Interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review