Cited by 7Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Does cannabis use impact cognitive behavioural therapy outcomes for anxiety and related disorders? A preliminary examination

Ouellette, Mélise J., Rowa, Karen, Cameron, Duncan H., Elcock, Ashleigh, Soreni, Noam, Pawluk, Elizabeth J., McCabe, Randi E.·2022·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Objectives The current study examined whether cannabis use frequency and cannabis-related problem severity (as per the Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test-Revised) predicted outcomes of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for anxiety and related disorders. It was predicted that greater frequency of cannabis use and greater cannabis-related problem severity would be associated with dampened treatment outcomes compared to less severe cannabis use presentations.Methods Participants were 253 adults seeking treatment for anxiety and related disorders. Cannabis use was categorized as non-use (n = 135), infrequent use (using monthly to 4 times per month; n = 45), and frequent use (using 2 or more times per week; n = 73). Individuals who reported using cannabis completed cannabis use and cannabis-related problem measures before starting a CBT group. Participants also completed a weekly symptom-specific measure of anxiety symptoms throughout CBT.Results As hypothesized, frequent cannabis use was associated with poorer outcomes in CBT for anxiety and related disorders compared to non-use. Despite this, individuals who used cannabis frequently still experienced a statistically significant decrease in their anxiety symptoms from pre-to post-CBT, with a large effect size (d = -0.87). Cannabis-related problems was not a significant predictor of CBT outcomes.Conclusions Cannabis use frequency was associated with poorer CBT outcomes for anxiety and related disorders, however these individuals still made notable treatment gains. The mechanism driving this relationship remains unclear. Future studies should attempt to replicate the current findings and examine possible mechanisms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.10.054

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 7

Authors
Ouellette, M. J., Rowa, K., Cameron, D. H., Elcock, A., Soreni, N., Pawluk, E. J., & McCabe, R. E.
Affiliations
St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton (CA)
Corresponding author
Rowa, Karen
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
156
Pages
690-697
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4307900371
Cited by
7
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
cannabis use, cannabis use frequency, cannabis-related problems, cognitive behavioral therapy, anxiety disorders, treatment outcomes, anxiety symptom reduction
MeSH terms
Cannabis, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review