Further development of an illness perception intervention for myocardial infarction patients: A randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objective To further develop and trial a brief in-hospital illness perception intervention for myocardial infarction (MI) patients. Methods One hundred and three patients admitted with acute MI were randomized to receive either standard care or standard care plus an illness perception intervention, which consisted of three half-hour patient sessions and one half-hour patient-and-spouse session delivered in hospital. Patients were followed up to 6 months. The main outcome was the difference between groups in rate of return to work. Results The intervention group had a faster rate of return to work than the control group, and more patients in the intervention group had returned to full time work by 3 months than in the control group. At discharge, patients in the intervention group demonstrated changes in causal attributions regarding their MI and higher perceived understanding of their condition, which remained at the 6-month follow-up. They also reported a better understanding of the information given in hospital, higher intentions to attend cardiac rehabilitation classes, lower anxiety about returning to work, greater increases in exercise, and made fewer phone calls to their general practitioner about their heart condition at follow-up. Conclusion This study replicates the findings of an earlier trial that a brief in-hospital illness perception intervention can change perceptions and improve rates of return to work in MI patients. It increases the generalizability of the in…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Altering unhelpful illness representations has demonstrated beneficial effects on health outcomes in other physical conditions.
“Furthermore, altering unhelpful illness representations has demonstrated beneficial effects on health outcomes in other physical conditions (Petrie et al . 2002; Broadbent et al . 2009; Chilcot & Moss-Morris 2013).”
From Improving Distress in Dialysis (iDiD): A tailored CBT self-management treatment for patients undergoing dialysis. (2016) · cites this paper as Broadbent et al . 2009
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 35 · Cited by 397
- Authors
- Broadbent, E., Ellis, C. J., Thomas, J., Gamble, G., & Petrie, K. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Auckland District Health Board (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Broadbent, Elizabeth
- Venue
- Journal of Psychosomatic Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-23
- ISSN
- 0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069990083
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 15.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- illness perception, myocardial infarction, return to work, causal attribution, cardiac rehabilitation, physical activity, patient education, spouse involvement, intervention generalizability
- MeSH terms
- Coronary Artery Bypass, Attitude to Health, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitalization, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Myocardial Infarction, Patient Compliance, Patient Discharge, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Behavior, Illness Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review