Cited by 68Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatment

Multidisciplinary treatment of fibromyalgia: Does cognitive behavior therapy increase the response to treatment?

Lera, Sara, Gelman, Saúl M., López, María J., Abenoza, Montse, Zorrilla, José Gabriel, Castro-Fornieles, Josefina, Salamero, Manel·2009·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective Multidisciplinary treatments (MTs) are usually recommended for reducing fibromyalgia (FM) symptoms and include physical exercise, drug management, education, and cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). However, there is no evidence that CBT adds efficacy to the other therapeutic components. This randomized controlled trial analyzed the response of FM patients to two MTs, with and without CBT, according to the presence of concurrent symptoms. Methods Eighty-three women with FM were randomly assigned to MT or combined MT and CBT. The MT included medical intervention, physical training, education, and discussion of the syndrome. The CBT focused on coping with stress, modifying lifestyles, and changing pain behaviors. Demographic and clinical data, information regarding tender points, and questionnaire responses about functional capability [Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ)], health status [36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)], and mental health [Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R)] were obtained at the beginning, at the end of the 15-week treatment, and at 6-month follow-up. Subgroups are identified in relation to treatment response. Results Sixty-six women (80%) completed treatment. Although the variance of the total sample had changed at posttreatment (F=2.67, P=.031), there was no significant effect for the TimexTreatment interaction (F=1.65, P=.16). Univariate tests detected a significant fall in the FIQ score. The subgroup of patients with fatigue showed…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.01.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 47 · Cited by 68

Authors
Lera, S., Gelman, S. M., López, M. J., Abenoza, M., Zorrilla, J. G., Castro-Fornieles, J., & Salamero, M.
Affiliations
  • Althaia (ES)
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
67
Issue
5
Pages
433-441
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973191803
Cited by
68
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
fibromyalgia, multidisciplinary treatment, cognitive behavioral therapy, fatigue, treatment response, functional capacity, symptom impact, women, tender points, pain behavior, stress coping, lifestyle modification
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Care Team, Patient Compliance, Sick Role, Exercise, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review