Cited by 72Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Concerns and worries in people living with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): A mixed methods study

Open access
Keeton, Rachel L., Mikocka-Walus, Antonina, Andrews, Jane M.·2015·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective This mixed-methods study aimed to explore concerns and worries related to living with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).Methods Overall, 294 patients with a clinically established diagnosis of IBD were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Concerns and worries were measured with one open-ended question. Measures of anxiety and depressive symptoms and disease activity were also administered. A thematic analysis was conducted and thematic map created. Spearman's rho was used to identify univariate correlations between predictors and the main themes. Binary logistic regression was used to test the predictors of the main themes.Results Despite the majority of study participants being in IBD remission (74%, n=217), all but 11 reported significant IBD-related concerns. Twenty two percent reported symptoms of depression and 41% of anxiety. Four themes were identified: Quality of life (51%); Unpredictability (35%); Symptoms (34%) and Treatments (19%). Males and older people were less concerned about Quality of life (OR=.597, 95% CI: .363-.980 and OR=.980, 95% CI: .965-.995, respectively). Those in remission were less concerned about Symptoms (OR=.510, 95% CI: .281- .926) while those with longer disease duration worried more about the Symptoms (OR=1.035, 95% CI: 1.010-1.061). Males were less concerned about Treatments (OR=.422, 95% CI: .229-.777).Conclusion IBD patients report significant disease-related concerns even when in remission. Further exploration of what predicts patient concerns may help in shaping health-care delivery so that it better addresses patient needs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.12.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 72

Authors
Keeton, R. L., Mikocka-Walus, A., & Andrews, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of York (GB)
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU)
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
78
Issue
6
Pages
573-578
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025619110
Cited by
72
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
inflammatory bowel disease, patient concerns, worry, anxiety, depression, quality of life, disease activity, remission, disease duration, patient needs
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Sex Factors, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Logistic Models, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review