The mediating role of sleep-related metacognitive processes in trait and pre-sleep state hyperarousal in insomnia disorder
Abstract
Objective Trait predisposition to hyperarousal and pre-sleep state hyperarousal are considered key factors in insomnia, but research also supports the role of cognitive and metacognitive processes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between unhelpful sleep-related beliefs, sleep-related metacognition and trait/pre-sleep state arousal in insomnia disorder. Method Sixty-eight subjects with insomnia disorder (DSM-5) and 36 good sleepers were evaluated with a set of questionnaires that included Dysfunctional Beliefs about Sleep scale (DBAS), Metacognitions Questionnaire - Insomnia (MCQI), Arousal Predisposition Scale (APS), and Pre-sleep Arousal Scale (PSAS). The statistical analyses included univariate, multivariate regression and mediation analyses. Results Subjects with insomnia reported higher scores on the DBAS, MCQI, APS, and PSAS (p's<0.001) compared to good sleepers. In the insomnia group, trait hyper-arousal was best determined by insomnia-related metacognition (p=0.02). Pre-sleep cognitive arousal was determined by insomnia-related metacognition (p=0.001) and trait hyperarousal (p<0.0001) after controlling for years of insomnia. Insomnia-metacognitive activity mediated the association between trait-hyperarousal and cognitive arousal (p=0.01, p=0.002) and the bidirectional association between pre-sleep cognitive and somatic arousal (p=0.002, p=0.04). Conclusion This study suggests that a broad range of cognitive and metacognitive processes may be involved in the development of sleep-related arousal among people with insomnia. Insomnia metacognitive activity may influence trait factors and pre-sleep state factors depending on insomnia duration. Both insomnia evaluation and treatment may also be focused on insomnia metacognitive processes especially in subject with a long history of insomnia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many individuals experience sleep onset anxiety as a result of worry or rumination, which creates a barrier to relaxation and prevents the natural transition into sleep.
“Many individuals experience sleep onset anxiety as a result of worry or rumination, which creates a barrier to relaxation, preventing the natural transition into sleep [12].”
From Pre-Sleep Anxiety: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches in Clinical Practice. (2026) · cites this paper as [12]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 34
- Authors
- Palagini, L., Ong, J. C., & Riemann, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Pisa (IT)
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Palagini, Laura
- Venue
- Journal of Psychosomatic Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 99
- Pages
- 59-65
- ISSN
- 0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2594003672
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Keywords
- insomnia, hyperarousal, dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, somatic arousal, cognitive arousal, mediation
- MeSH terms
- Metacognition, Arousal, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review